How is it not? If you're going to contest it then give your reasons. I only give vip quality to images of high resolution, above-average artistic intent, originality, and overall beauty. While I will agree that some will not see the beauty in this image, I would hope that most would. I have only tagged 4 images vip quality out of the 30,000+ in my favorites. That's about the right percentage for what deserves that tag.
If enough people contest the two that I added today, we can remove the tags. But until then, outside of our invisible anonymous friends, I intend to use that tag for this image and #330530
Anonymous said: Going by this post and the threshold of quality your favorites has, you're hardly qualified to use the tag.
Anonymous is so brave! You go girl!
I still stand by my statement. The number of favorites and my "threshold" have nothing to do with why this image was deemed vip quality by me. I was just giving an example.
If you are the same person, you still have not listed any specific reasons. I'm done dealing with you. I'll let people with real names make the decisions.
Did you even read the wiki entry on that tag? How about this tag being really subjective and useless because of the voting system (not that the latter is reliable). Besides, usernames aren't real names (except for albert).
I'm not trying to piss you off but you're prejudiced against anonymous comments so there's not much I can do about that.
I've always posted anonymously but I may have been wrong to do so with this one since it did call for someone with some kind of "authority". It doesn't change my point though.
Every anonymous comment you visibly assumed to be anonymous wasn't me, LaC. :P
Anyway, I searched the forums and found out that tag was a joke between phane and dr_fine_rolo from way back, so technically they're the only ones "qualified". Go figure.
