The art in it's pristine form.

it can't be perfectly recreated by 4 pixels. The brown dot is exactly 2 pixels wider both horizontally and vertically!!

I don't understand it, this is not the fully image of Marnie that I expected.

I guess we're living in the Soviet Union now.

I didn't know this was supposed to be a person in the first place, must have missed something.

this is just a difficult example of the otaku test

Is it against tagging guidelines to remove the character and copyright tags? Even if the artist claims this is a picture of Marnie, it's very obviously not.

StalkingPanda said:

Is it against tagging guidelines to remove the character and copyright tags? Even if the artist claims this is a picture of Marnie, it's very obviously not.

Is the "Tag what you see, not what you know" doctrine still in effect? If so, almost all of the tags need to go.

aurix_darastrix said:

Is the "Tag what you see, not what you know" doctrine still in effect? If so, almost all of the tags need to go.

But you can clearly see the various details... It's because of people like you that can't appreciate fine art that our world is so devoid of happiness.