RiderFan said: Not nearly cute enough for the pool. Remember, it has to be disgustingly adorable and not just really cute.
Interesting. What are the criteria, exactly? This one I can sort of see why, I guess, but at what point do differences of opinion come into play? Like post #233614 almost strips away my AT field with it's sweetness. Or post #329565 or... goddamn, looks like you could just search takahero.
This vaguely reminds me that I wish we could rate artists and pools, too; or have some way of ranking them according to a purely preferential methodology.
Screw it. It may be a matter of what you think is or isn't cute, but I belive it should go into the "digustingly adorable" pool, therefore, I am adding it.
