Okay, this is a very good warning. But counter-response: If they didn't want you putting things in the girl's mouths, then why make said mouths so fully functional with actual saliva and responsive tongue?

NegativeSoul said:

Okay, this is a very good warning. But counter-response: If they didn't want you putting things in the girl's mouths, then why make said mouths so fully functional with actual saliva and responsive tongue?

Counter-counter-response: So you'd get a blowjob from a tiger? It's got a fully functional mouth with actual saliva and responsive tongue too.

Obedient robot girls capable of reason are not the same as a tiger.

Steak said:

Obedient robot girls capable of reason are not the same as a tiger.

They can't be that obedient if they bite your dick off.

NegativeSoul said:

Okay, this is a very good warning. But counter-response: If they didn't want you putting things in the girl's mouths, then why make said mouths so fully functional with actual saliva and responsive tongue?

An idiot test, basically. If you stick an appendage in there and it gets bitten off, you're an idiot.

Alanis, killed by a T-doll called M1 Garand

NegativeSoul said:

Okay, this is a very good warning. But counter-response: If they didn't want you putting things in the girl's mouths, then why make said mouths so fully functional with actual saliva and responsive tongue?

Consensual blowjobs.

bunkhead said:

They can't be that obedient if they bite your dick off.

Can't be obedient if they're unconscious and default to shutting down,including shutting their mouths.

As for tigers...