Ai-Generated.

Hands and hair.

Yeah I couldn't tell that this was AI generated, especially not after checking the artist's twitter and seeing 300k followers, another mistake on my part, apologies.

Hole18 said:

Ai-Generated.

Hands and hair.

This still looks different than your average AI artwork, I should have checked the artist tag, since you could see there that there are 2 empty pages worth of deleted AI artwork...

yooyooko said:

Yeah I couldn't tell that this was AI generated, especially not after checking the artist's twitter and seeing 300k followers, another mistake on my part, apologies.

The Pencil lines were a clever disguise, but some things just didn't look cohesive.
At a 2nd glance, you can also see the upper teeth and neck.

Ugh, we are gonna have to sit through 91 more of these crap because the person decided there needs to be 100 days of these daily uploads.

You'd have to follow the comments from the original Twitter threads to determine whether it actually is.

Tarte's recent Asuka works is AI-generated Asuka artwork that was outed by airani_iofifteen on Twitter. The assumption is that some other artists are properly drawing Asuka works in response but have designed them to mock normal AI-generated hang-ups like finger counts and hair-clothes morphing.

I guess the artist is post-processing it a bit, I saw their posts on Twitter from the winter-spring of 2022 (when no midjourney, SD and others) and there were regular professional drawings. So that is why they look this good ig :\

FJH said:

The assumption is that some other artists are properly drawing Asuka works in response but have designed them to mock normal AI-generated hang-ups like finger counts and hair-clothes morphing.

So not only is AI getting better to become basically indistinguishable from hand-drawn art, but human artists are now intentionally mimicking AI? The witch-hunting and paranoia is going to ramp up to 11.

Shinjidude said:

So not only is AI getting better to become basically indistinguishable from hand-drawn art, but human artists are now intentionally mimicking AI? The witch-hunting and paranoia is going to ramp up to 11.

I don't find that surprising. The AI generate art is trained from datasets from the best artists. The stuff it generates, aside from the glaring mistakes, is a very good reference and probably better rendered than 95% of the artists out there, especially the newer ones. It's not unusual for artist to mimic what they perceive as better. It's how most artists start out. I just hope they don't just stop there and not bother putting in their own characteristic style and adaptations once they get off the ground.

Agemmata said:

I don't find that surprising. The AI generate art is trained from datasets from the best artists. The stuff it generates, aside from the glaring mistakes, is a very good reference and probably better rendered than 95% of the artists out there, especially the newer ones. It's not unusual for artist to mimic what they perceive as better. It's how most artists start out. I just hope they don't just stop there and not bother putting in their own characteristic style and adaptations once they get off the ground.

I think you're misunderstanding that the artists in this case aren't mimicking AI because they think it's superior, but to mock AI and artists that use it as a crutch.

blindVigil said:

I think you're misunderstanding that the artists in this case aren't mimicking AI because they think it's superior, but to mock AI and artists that use it as a crutch.

I'm aware of that. The response is to the general trend that artists ARE mimicking the AI, at least on Twitter.

CitrusC said:

Ugh, we are gonna have to sit through 91 more of these crap because the person decided there needs to be 100 days of these daily uploads.

I didn’t notice it was an AI, what’s your problem?