Feel free to reflag once yoou can for sure say it's ai-generated.
Thanks.

Provence said:

Feel free to reflag once yoou can for sure say it's ai-generated.
Thanks.

The image is very obviously ai generated so I'm surprised you didn't pick on it. Artist got caught twice using ai for this image and they've been reposting versions that have the obvious ai tells out of it but it's still not enough to hide that it's ai. The right ear is an amalgamation, earrings are a warped mess, the hair ends are fused to different parts of the hair, the teeth are of low res quality and at odds with the rest of the image, eye shadow isn't actually eye shadow but a mirrored image of the pupil.

iori98 said:

The image is very obviously ai generated so I'm surprised you didn't pick on it. Artist got caught twice using ai for this image and they've been reposting versions that have the obvious ai tells out of it but it's still not enough to hide that it's ai. The right ear is an amalgamation, earrings are a warped mess, the hair ends are fused to different parts of the hair, the teeth are of low res quality and at odds with the rest of the image, eye shadow isn't actually eye shadow but a mirrored image of the pupil.

All this and the massive lack of consistency between their artworks. The tongue being human or forked, the color of the eyes/hair/skin differing from each one, the hair being completely different styles, etc...
Definitely really should've realized it was AI way sooner with all the signs, my bad... I'll reflag this one for deletion while the rest of their works should also be deleted.

psychedelic_rabbit said:

All this and the massive lack of consistency between their artworks. The tongue being human or forked, the color of the eyes/hair/skin differing from each one, the hair being completely different styles, etc...
Definitely really should've realized it was AI way sooner with all the signs, my bad... I'll reflag this one for deletion while the rest of their works should also be deleted.

Their pixiv profile is as close to an acknowledgement as we'll get to them saying that they aren't an artist since it states that they only use commissions art and have started using different "programs" and Adobe to get better. It's not hard to guess what those programs are since only prompters would try to be this secretive about their art process. No one should upload any art from them since it will be AI generated.

iori98 said:

The image is very obviously ai generated so I'm surprised you didn't pick on it. Artist got caught twice using ai for this image and they've been reposting versions that have the obvious ai tells out of it but it's still not enough to hide that it's ai. The right ear is an amalgamation, earrings are a warped mess, the hair ends are fused to different parts of the hair, the teeth are of low res quality and at odds with the rest of the image, eye shadow isn't actually eye shadow but a mirrored image of the pupil.

I'm not here to not approve something based on a hunch.

I'm not here to not approve something based on a hunch.

Is it not alarmingly clear that its AI, though? id say its not just art mistake paranoia. Genuinely curious if anyone else thinks that, too.

Provence said:

I'm not here to not approve something based on a hunch.

You don't have to worry about that. It's not a hunch. It's about as blatant as a human having too many fingers.

AdventZero said:

You don't have to worry about that. It's not a hunch. It's about as blatant as a human having too many fingers.

Look, I'd rather have something thoroughly checked than not.
You'd be surprised how often "obvious" things ended up being a false alert.