Flat color is AI now? This could easily be cel shaded 3d or something else. I'm not saying it's not AI, and the lack of a source is a huge strike against this one, but we keep tagging things as AI with next to no actual evidence.
Flat color is AI now? This could easily be cel shaded 3d or something else. I'm not saying it's not AI, and the lack of a source is a huge strike against this one, but we keep tagging things as AI with next to no actual evidence.
Maybe bc my point of view- (unless someone more can say why is Ai outside the tag)
Suspecting AI based off of coloring or drawing style is insane nonsense. seriously don't do that since you'll eventually end up accusing an actual artist of AI because you'll think the coloring is AI looking. Remember AI can't do minor details and most prompters only know how to get rid of obvious AI faults. For instance the buttons on the shirt and the shoelaces are signs that this was AI generated. AI will often times have image quality issues within certain parts of the image like the inside of the mouth or eyes.
Suspecting AI based off of coloring or drawing style is insane nonsense. seriously don't do that since you'll eventually end up accusing an actual artist of AI because you'll think the coloring is AI looking. Remember AI can't do minor details and most prompters only know how to get rid of obvious AI faults. For instance the buttons on the shirt and the shoelaces are signs that this was AI generated. AI will often times have image quality issues within certain parts of the image like the inside of the mouth or eyes.
Sorry; it was stressed (pd: same happend to me with the hair, for example Yelan from genshin but i never accuse it)
Sorry; it was stressed (pd: same happend to me with the hair, for example Yelan from genshin)
It's not really good form to tag AI based on a loose hunch since it's essentially a death sentence to a post, and will likely be used as evidence for any subsequent images by that artist. A false positive has real ramifications.
