What is the evidence that this artist's work is AI generated? It's not mentioned as such on their Misskey or Pixiv sites. I'm not seeing obvious AI give-aways in it. I see that all their past work has been flagged and nuked too, but no discussion as to what the rational was (unless I'm missing something). We really should require some sort of evidence before blanket banning artists.

Hair disappearing into eyes is the most obvious sign in this particular one, in my opinion.

You don't think that's a z-layering thing? With only a couple of exceptions it looks like the artist layers the eyes on top of the hair.

It might be. I think there's an overlap between flaws in quick/sketchy digital art (like elements disappearing due to layering) and what people perceive to be AI artifacts. I might have jumped the gun a bit with this one, I should have probably posted in the AI thread first.

Yeah, I'd much rather we have some sort of discussion on it, and if all this is one person's hunch, mass appeal these to give them a second chance. I think most approvers (myself included), just resign anything tagged "AI-generated" to its death, which really isn't fair to the artist if it's only based on one person's unilateral hunch.

Shinjidude said:

What is the evidence that this artist's work is AI generated? It's not mentioned as such on their Misskey or Pixiv sites. I'm not seeing obvious AI give-aways in it. I see that all their past work has been flagged and nuked too, but no discussion as to what the rational was (unless I'm missing something). We really should require some sort of evidence before blanket banning artists.

Nothing particularly damning about this one, but the rest of the """artist's""" work is pretty blatant.

A member did find some sus details in topic #22285 just now.