About "AI-Gen commentary": The check gave the following results: 72% Human 28% AI Moreover, there are as many as two sources talking about the image, but generation with the AI or at least AI-assisted is not mentioned anywhere.
Reasons I would tag this as ai-assisted: - hand in the top left (four fingers and one lookes chopped off) - plushie in the top left near pillow (overall looks derpy and not in an intentional way) - orange bunny middle left (the placement of the ears looks wrong, where the "head" looks like it was generated as a butt) - the cat at the left looks entirely unnatural (the tail is like a leg, the face isn't a face, and it has three ears and/or a broken neck) - the bottom tassal on the right looks disconnected and broken apart - the figure 8 ties have numerous inconsistencies - the patterned black trim at the base of her dress have several inconsistencies and looks like a generator "getting confused" (i.e. not being able to account for) the curvature of her body - the hair is incredibly jagged and messy, which tends to happen a lot with generators - not only that, but there are weird spots of lighting on the hair in an area of the image that is otherwise completely in shade (see near her left ear and on her right arm): I highly doubt someone who drew and colored this by hand would have made an oversight like that. However, someone who generated the image and then did touch-up afterwards is very likely to make that misake
I will post this in topic #22285 to see what others think.
