If you alter tags for Bridget to be "1boy" you are a transphobic shit and should leave the site. if you dislike this comment, you are part of the problem.
If you alter tags for Bridget to be "1boy" you are a transphobic shit and should leave the site. if you dislike this comment, you are part of the problem.
If you change tags without understanding how the site works or at least reading the tag wikis, you will get banned for tag vandalism.
ah, so the site is transphobic, thanks for the information. bet not a single one of these dislikes originates from anything but a cis het male.
No need to act like a stereotype. Yes, the site's tagging guidelines for trans people are fucking retarded, but that's no excuse to act like a whiny child.
No need to act like a stereotype. Yes, the site's tagging guidelines for trans people are fucking retarded, but that's no excuse to act like a whiny child.
even if the tagging is stupid and it were to only be how things look, first of all this image does not display a penis and is in full feminine clothes, even if a penis were present, bridget looks far more feminine and would be considered a futa, there is no excuse for something which is factually just incorrect. as for me being a Whiny child, sure, i might over react when i come across injustice, and this is simply one of those cases.
even if the tagging is stupid and it were to only be how things look, first of all this image does not display a penis and is in full feminine clothes, even if a penis were present, bridget looks far more feminine and would be considered a futa, there is no excuse for something which is factually just incorrect. as for me being a Whiny child, sure, i might over react when i come across injustice, and this is simply one of those cases.
You're a brand new user, just created today, with no contribution history and no context for the back-and-forth discussion that has taken place on this topic. If you go to the forum, you will find that there are plenty of people having their best attempt at rational discussion about this across numerous threads going back years, and that is the correct venue. I don't always agree with the decisions of the majority, but intentionally and knowingly tagging against whatever the current guidance is will only result in being banned for vandalism and all your edits reversed.
If you feel deeply about this, try learning about the site, contributing to it so people can see that you care and aren't just a 1-off troll, and then engage in those discussions with your perspective and see if you can move the needle, but try to remember that we're all people here, not just NPCs.
You're a brand new user, just created today, with no contribution history and no context for the back-and-forth discussion that has taken place on this topic. If you go to the forum, you will find that there are plenty of people having their best attempt at rational discussion about this across numerous threads going back years, and that is the correct venue. I don't always agree with the decisions of the majority, but intentionally and knowingly tagging against whatever the current guidance is will only result in being banned for vandalism and all your edits reversed.
If you feel deeply about this, try learning about the site, contributing to it so people can see that you care and aren't just a 1-off troll, and then engage in those discussions with your perspective and see if you can move the needle, but try to remember that we're all people here, not just NPCs.
alright but if people have tried for years as you say and still can't get through to thick skulled idiots then rapid vandalism might be the only way? it's called a protest and it works, if the source material gets ignored which states she's female, because people don't like that in their little website, then what's the point in being civil?
alright but if people have tried for years as you say and still can't get through to thick skulled idiots then rapid vandalism might be the only way? it's called a protest and it works, if the source material gets ignored which states she's female, because people don't like that in their little website, then what's the point in being civil?
even if the tagging is stupid and it were to only be how things look, first of all this image does not display a penis and is in full feminine clothes, even if a penis were present, bridget looks far more feminine and would be considered a futa, there is no excuse for something which is factually just incorrect.
That’s the whole point of otoko no ko. “Draw a boy, call it a girl” as nonamethanks put it. And Bridget has been considered one for almost two decades before it was revealed that she’s transgender. The tagging for SFW Bridget posts with explicit reference to her gender identity as 1girl is basically a compromise. I’m in favor of posts like this being tagged 1girl, but without an explicit reference to her status, what is shown might not enough to count under our current policy.
Edit: typo
Argustrans said:
alright but if people have tried for years as you say and still can't get through to thick skulled idiots then rapid vandalism might be the only way? it's called a protest and it works, if the source material gets ignored which states she's female, because people don't like that in their little website, then what's the point in being civil?
i'm genuinely curious to your answer, sincerely.
If you do that, then you will get banned, your edits will be reverted, and you will have accomplished nothing.
That’s the whole point of okoto no ko. “Draw a boy, call it a girl” as nonamethanks put it. And Bridget has been considered one for almost two decades before it was revealed that she’s transgender. The tagging for SFW Bridget posts with explicit reference to her gender identity as 1girl is basically a compromise. I’m in favor of posts like this being tagged 1girl, but without an explicit reference to her status, what is shown might not enough to count under our current policy.
If you do that, then you will get banned, your edits will be reverted, and you will have accomplished nothing.
not enough explicit reference? well i don't see an Alternate Gender tag here, so this is Bridget, and Bridget has been revealed female, so 1girl the argument of "we don't know her current status" and "has been for decades" is a rather comedic thing considering mordred_(fate) has been male for centuries in Arthurian Legend???????
not enough explicit reference? well i don't see an Alternate Gender tag here, so this is Bridget, and Bridget has been revealed female, so 1girl the argument of "we don't know her current status" and "has been for decades" is a rather comedic thing considering mordred_(fate) has been male for centuries in Arthurian Legend???????
The otoko no ko trope blurs the lines so much that even a post like this is ambiguous. Bridget is still considered 1boy by default, so this post would not qualify for 1girl.
For reference, forum #222668 is where evazion, the site owner, set the current policy defining the criteria for tagging Bridget as 1girl. Following that is a BUR to broaden the policy to include SFW posts without reference to Bridget being transgender. It got some support, but the majority of voters were against it and it was ultimately rejected.
