Actually,if this...thing can breed more than they die of,their species would survived,which is part of how evolution works:survival of the fittest no matter how stupid looking the result is.
This is true, but it's truly not how vertebrate evolution on Earth works.
This thing has 6 limbs (4 legs + 2 pectoral fins), which never happens in real-world vertebrates. Real world vertabrates are pretty strictly tetrapods (with the limbs having developed from the anal and pectoral fins of fish). The only exceptions are things such as snakes or whales where some or all of those limbs de-evolved.
It's the same reason (in part) angels, centaurs, Pegasi, winged 4-legged dragons, etc couldn't have evolved given reality.
Shinjidude said: This is true, but it's truly not how vertebrate evolution on Earth works.
This thing has 6 limbs (4 legs + 2 pectoral fins), which never happens in real-world vertebrates. Real world vertabrates are pretty strictly tetrapods (with the limbs having developed from the anal and pectoral fins of fish). The only exceptions are things such as snakes or whales where some or all of those limbs de-evolved.
It's the same reason (in part) angels, centaurs, Pegasi, winged 4-legged dragons, etc couldn't have evolved given reality.
Angels were created, in part, by God who has consistently given the finger to the laws of science.
This is true, but it's truly not how vertebrate evolution on Earth works.
This thing has 6 limbs (4 legs + 2 pectoral fins), which never happens in real-world vertebrates. Real world vertabrates are pretty strictly tetrapods (with the limbs having developed from the anal and pectoral fins of fish). The only exceptions are things such as snakes or whales where some or all of those limbs de-evolved.
It's the same reason (in part) angels, centaurs, Pegasi, winged 4-legged dragons, etc couldn't have evolved given reality.
What about 8 limbs - 4 front and 4 back - as in a pegataur/winged centaur? Would that be even more or less implausible?
