Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More ยป Listing Upload Hot Changes Help
A list of tags to help categorize this search. Space delimited.

Search

Blacklisted (help)

  • guro
  • scat
  • furry -rating:g
Disable all Re-enable all

Tags

  • ? pokemon 300k
  • ? pokemon dppt 13k
  • ? eevee 5.3k
  • ? umbreon 2.6k
  • ? glaceon 2.5k
  • ? vaporeon 2.1k
  • ? espeon 2.0k
  • ? leafeon 1.8k
  • ? flareon 1.6k
  • ? jolteon 1.3k
  • ? evolutionary line 5.2k
  • ? pokemon (creature) 166k
  • ? no humans 167k
  • ? simple background 2.1M
  • ? closed eyes 791k
  • ? full body 929k
  • ? multiple girls 1.7M
  • ? tail 877k
  • ? brown eyes 906k
  • ? red eyes 1.4M
  • ? white background 1.7M
  • ? commentary request 3.6M
  • ? highres 6.0M
  • ? bad id 1.3M
  • ? bad pixiv id 980k

Options

Related

  • Deleted
  • Random
  • History
  • Discussions
  • Count
  • Posts Wiki Search »
  • Size
    • Small
    • Medium
    • Large
    • Huge
    • Huge
    • Gigantic
    • Absurd
    • Show scores
  • Edit

    A post centered around evolutionary lines of Pokemon and similar franchises (Digimon, etc).

    Also applies to fakemon or original creatures/monsters, so long as it's clear that they're part of the same evolutionary family.

    A few notes:

    • For this tag to apply, the picture should reasonably be about evolutionary lines. That is, the theme connecting characters in the picture should be the fact that they're part of the same family, not that they're part of the same franchise.
      • For example, post #4134648 technically contains a lot of evolutionary lines, but realistically nobody searching for this tag wants the majority of posts for unpopular pokemons to be everyone-style posts.
    • For an evolutionary line with 3 or more creatures, not every single one needs to be present. This tag is fine to use if there is focus on, for example, the first stage and third stage of an evolutionary line with the second stage creature not being present.
    • For Pokemon, Paradox Pokemon (introduced in Scarlet & Violet) are not considered to be part of the same evolutionary line as the Pokemon they are referencing

    View wiki

    post #1037017
    post #1035234
    post #1032913
    post #1018972
    post #1008481
    post #1006955
    post #1005347
    post #1001885
    post #993281
    post #969617
    post #967774
    post #963797
    post #934364
    post #926342
    post #925530
    post #897832
    post #890258
    1 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /