Chiera said:
@keonas
You meant topic #8554 probably?
Yes, yes, i clearly did, but got it wrong. will be going now.
Posted under General
Chiera said:
@keonas
You meant topic #8554 probably?
Yes, yes, i clearly did, but got it wrong. will be going now.
post #2577153
post #2723613
A couple nude filters I flagged that were reapproved. Unless the way we've handled them has changed recently, these should be hard deletions...
feline_lump said:
post #2577153
post #2723613
A couple nude filters I flagged that were reapproved. Unless the way we've handled them has changed recently, these should be hard deletions...
Nude filters are most likely to be deleted. A hard rule doesn't exist.
feline_lump said:
post #2577153
post #2723613
A couple nude filters I flagged that were reapproved. Unless the way we've handled them has changed recently, these should be hard deletions...
Are you sure the last one isn't a first party edit? Its really only when those other people does it that it becomes undesirable.
ion288 said:
Are you sure the last one isn't a first party edit? Its really only when those other people does it that it becomes undesirable.
It’s a third party shop. The blurry chain is the most obvious giveaway, but the usual telltale signs from removing the shirt are there too.
Chiera said:
Nude filters are most likely to be deleted. A hard rule doesn't exist.
The nude filter wiki states:
A picture that has been photoshopped to depict nude or partially nude characters when in the original artwork they were fully or partially clothed. topic #12657 concluded that all nude filters are to be deleted.
feline_lump said:
The nude filter wiki states:
The discussion went on a bit after the wiki was edited.
Edited the wiki a bit to reflect that one should expect deletion when uploading such a thing, but it's not hard against the rules (like, if you find an Approver who thinks it's still good enough).
cirno_goes_in_fridge said:
I'd like to ask for serious consideration on deleting the contents of pool #12117. The series in question contains frequent, graphic, and often violent child abuse. I fail to see any possible merit that would justify these grotesque depictions as worth preserving.
Unless it violates one of the rules described in the ToS, we don't delete posts for containing offensive content. You can always blacklist the artist's works if they make you feel uncomfortable.
cirno_goes_in_fridge said:
I'd like to ask for serious consideration on deleting the contents of pool #12117. The series in question contains frequent, graphic, and often violent child abuse. I fail to see any possible merit that would justify these grotesque depictions as worth preserving.
How is this worse than something like child guro search for example?
cirno_goes_in_fridge said:
I'm not debating the worth of any of those images, that's irrelevant. My point is: does this pool stand up to the higher level of artistic and qualitative scrutiny test applied to grotesque content? If it does, what merit does it possess to pass this additional harder test?
There is presently only one post in that pool tagged as guro (post #2745564), and even that's very tame compared to most of the other things you can find in that tag. I would argue that the pool hasn't yet crossed the threshold to be judged by those higher standards, although it's possible that approvers or staff would feel differently.
feline_lump said:
There is presently only one post in that pool tagged as guro (post #2745564), and even that's very tame compared to most of the other things you can find in that tag. I would argue that the pool hasn't yet crossed the threshold to be judged by those higher standards, although it's possible that approvers or staff would feel differently.
It does not -- far from it. Yes, it has disturbing content, but I would not consider that to fall in the same category with many of the other blacklisted tags. In fact, one could argue that is part of its appeal.
cirno_goes_in_fridge said:
Perhaps I am biased having been a victim of abuse myself. Seeing the same thing happen to someone I love makes me sick to the pit of my stomach. I couldn't in good conscience just walk away without saying anything.
Right. If you don't like the content, you're always welcome to blacklist it in your tags. However, you don't decide what belongs or doesn't belong in the gallery because of those highly personal preferences. That applies to us, the approvers, also. We can flag images for disturbing content, but there is a generally acceptable level of tolerance such that other users can have enjoy their fetishes too.
EDIT: stuff
Updated
PyontaKun said:
It's still in mod queue, and as such I won't link it for now, but is there a case for a commissioner requesting deletion of their commissioned art that's been posted? I've got mixed feelings about my dumb OC's giant boobs being on here.
Mm, about that... I think it's the artist that gets the final say in this. You can request them to ask albert to make an exceptional case to double delete your commission, but the "deletion" you're seeking is not exactly how we do things on the site (as it'll be 'deleted' but not really deleted, just in the deleted gallery).
Mikaeri said:
Mm, about that... I think it's the artist that gets the final say in this. You can request them to ask albert to make an exceptional case to double delete your commission, but the "deletion" you're seeking is not exactly how we do things on the site (as it'll be 'deleted' but not really deleted, just in the deleted gallery).
Oh, I understand it's not a full deletion. I just don't really think that I want that commission so visibly on here if any of them.
At any rate, the uploader doesn't exactly have a stellar upload record, so if it doesn't get out of modqueue my issue kinda solves itself.
Updated
PyontaKun said:
Oh, I understand it's not a full deletion. I just don't really think that I want that commission so visibly on here if any of them.
At any rate, the uploader doesn't exactly have a stellar upload record, so if it doesn't get out of modqueue my issue kinda solves itself.
Fair enough. Just let it expire in the queue.
Accidentally created these two wiki pages since I thought these tags did not exist (due to me failing to notice I mislabeled). I already migrated all the posts related to this to the appropriate tags.
Jnglmpera said:
Accidentally created these two wiki pages since I thought these tags did not exist (due to me failing to notice I mislabeled). I already migrated all the posts related to this to the appropriate tags.
Thank you whoever deleted it!