imply ||_|| -> |_|

BUR #2970 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication ||_|| -> |_|

Same visual effect.

For linking purpose, since they're broken in the BUR due to DText limitation: ||_|| and |_|

EDIT: The bulk update request #2970 (forum #168908) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #2970 (forum #168908) has been approved by @evazion.

I don't know that these even need to be separate tags. It's not like we have multiple levels of thickness for =_=. There doesn't seem to be much difference between the two in practice either.