missing crotchless tags implications

BUR #4403 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication crotchless_pantyhose -> pantyhose
create implication crotchless_pants -> pants
create implication crotchless_swimsuit -> crotchless

Should be self-explanatory.

These implications seem fine. On a side note though, isn't a good portion of the crotchless_pants tag just chaps?

NWF_Renim said:

These implications seem fine. On a side note though, isn't a good portion of the crotchless_pants tag just chaps?

If you mean something like this, then sure, I would call those pants. But most chaps look more like this, which are not what I would call pants. Some go even lower than those. Most chaps aren't tagged as pants or crotchless pants, either.

blindVigil said:

If you mean something like this, then sure, I would call those pants. But most chaps look more like this, which are not what I would call pants. Some go even lower than those. Most chaps aren't tagged as pants or crotchless pants, either.

I think you have misunderstood me, I mean that a lot of what is being tagged as crotchless_pants should instead have been tagged chaps.

NWF_Renim said:

I think you have misunderstood me, I mean that a lot of what is being tagged as crotchless_pants should instead have been tagged chaps.

Ahhh, yeah, I see what you mean now. My blacklist was hiding the mistagged posts

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #4403 (forum #178760) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

The bulk update request #4403 (forum #178760) has been approved by @evazion.