thegreatmck said:
The blur in first one just doesn't add much to it, even though I understand the point. So far though? Approvers weren't interested enough to give these two a pass. That's all.
Posted under General
Sessyoin_Kiara said:
It wasn't, it bypassed the modqueue. What's that source? Is it an edit or a paid reward?
It's visible on twitter here, but apparently it's hidden for some by the author: https://twitter.com/evXSPR0wouIwIyF/status/1767104926847750644/photo/1
Hello, could you please review these posts again.
post #7198632
post #7198631
Updated
sidbarrett said:
Hello, could you please review these posts again, keep in mind that no approver reviewed them.
post #7198632
post #7198631
They probably were looked at while they were in the queue, but that was a month ago. Records of how many reviewed it are removed after a certain amount of time. Look at the moderation histories of status:deleted age:>1month and you'll see those posts also have no records of approvers looking at them.
Pfaradissa said:
It's visible on twitter here, but apparently it's hidden for some by the author: https://twitter.com/evXSPR0wouIwIyF/status/1767104926847750644/photo/1
I followed the artist and media asset #19595099 is the original image, it probably can't be replaced because the color is slightly different. Avoid sourcing images from third-parties.
Hi.
Curious about post #7328852 and post #7328853 not being approved. Clean scans of official art. Is it just the pov perspective of them looking up? Ill appeal but im just curious.
These pieces by white_clover_(unfy8472) are of the same quality as the ones approved. Why were they deleted? Thanks.
post #7330156 and children
post #7330801 and children
post #7331410 and children
Updated
Can you please review this post again?
post #7328165
Would like some feedback on these posts since I feel like they're fairly high quality, maybe the low resolution ones are too pixely ? Trying my best to upload stuff that passes a good quality bar.
post #7333021 ( alongside child post #7333028 )
post #7332961
post #7332950
Can someone tell me what's wrong with post #7335072, even with the previous posts being approved?
Why was this post not approved?
post #7328165
Is there a particular reason why these artworks were no approved? The quality is the same as the other approved works from the artist.
post #7328096
post #7328084
How come post #7332927 did not get approved? It genuinely baffles me - massakasama to me seems like an artist whose art is generally regarded to be great. Is there something wrong with the upload? I've tagged it fairly well, the resolution is high, and I explained why it's impossible to provide the source...
Would appreciate someone to reconsider this. Thanks.
How were these not approved? These posts were high quality IMO
Updated
post #7342915 why was this post not approved?
it's a cute cat in a box
Maybe because of the tagging i did before, which should be fixed now.
Updated
Hello, could you please review these posts again, keep in mind that only eight approvers checked these.
post #7345522
post #7345581
Updated
Why isn't post #7346739 good enough? Like what's the problem here?