BUR #41854 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication galatea_("succubus")_(identity_v) -> galatea_(identity_v)
Posted under Tags
BUR #41854 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication galatea_("succubus")_(identity_v) -> galatea_(identity_v)
BUR #41855 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication grace_(rosemary)_(identity_v) -> grace_(identity_v)
create implication grace_(chef_k)_(identity_v) -> grace_(identity_v)
create implication grace_(weeping_goddess)_(identity_v) -> grace_(identity_v)
create implication grace_(halberd_of_silence)_(identity_v) -> grace_(identity_v)
create implication grace_(death's_head_hawkmoth)_(identity_v) -> grace_(identity_v)
BUR #41856 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication philippe_(fury)_(identity_v) -> philippe_(identity_v)
create implication philippe_(shower)_(identity_v) -> philippe_(identity_v)
BUR #41857 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication nightmare_(duke_white_raven)_(identity_v) -> nightmare_(identity_v)
BUR #41858 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication alva_lorenz_(warden) -> alva_lorenz
create implication alva_lorenz_(haze) -> alva_lorenz
BUR #41859 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication ithaqua_(morningstar)_(identity_v) -> ithaqua_(identity_v)
create implication ithaqua_(invisible_man)_(identity_v) -> ithaqua_(identity_v)
create implication ithaqua_(philosopher's_stone)_(identity_v) -> ithaqua_(identity_v)
BUR #41860 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication fool's_gold_(infernal_sin)_(identity_v) -> fool's_gold_(identity_v)
create implication fool's_gold_(gold_miner)_(identity_v) -> fool's_gold_(identity_v)
BUR #41861 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication hullabaloo_(brightest_star)_(identity_v) -> hullabaloo_(identity_v)
Phew, I think that's all of them.
Now dear Identity V uploaders: Please please please make wikis and stuff for your alternate costumes from now on. And use this thread, please. It'd be much appreciated to not have to do this for a series I am unfamiliar with, and just noticed was missing implications period. Thank you.
First of all, thank you for making this. I knew these tags were always pretty messy but had no idea of the scope since I only really uploaded a select few characters.
Knowledge_Seeker said:
BUR #41847 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication wu_chang_(celestial_cycle) -> wu_chang
create implication wu_chang_(the_binary_star) -> wu_chang
I know you said you don't know the series (and I'd imagine that's the majority) so just tegarding Wu Chang, the term refers to two characters. They're based off of actual Chinese underworld deities, and for the most part I see them tagged separately as Xie Bian (the "White Guard") and Fan Wujiu (the "Black Guard"). The tag should overall just be phased out in favor of tagging them individually.
I also will add Robbie momentarily since he's the one I can see as obviously missing.
EDIT: Nope my bad, always read BURs with your glasses on. I'll just stick to doing the Wu Chang guys' BURs.
Updated by schule
BUR #41867 has been rejected.
create implication robbie_(marshmallow)_(identity_v) -> robbie_(identity_v)
create implication robbie_(ivan)_(identity_v) -> robbie_(identity_v)
create implication robbie_(wail)_(identity_v) -> robbie_(identity_v)
Robbie tag fixing.
EDIT: See above, my bad.
Updated by schule
The bulk update request #41867 (forum #358520) has been rejected by @schule.
BUR #41869 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication xie_bian_(broken_blossoms) -> xie_bian
create implication xie_bian_(far_east_wind) -> xie_bian
create implication xie_bian_(qilin_merchant) -> xie_bian
create implication xie_bian_(flying_guillotine) -> xie_bian
create implication xie_bian_(master_yin_yang) -> xie_bian
create implication xie_bian_(brilliant_polaris) -> xie_bian
create implication xie_bian_(requiem) -> xie_bian
create implication xie_bian_(binary_star) -> xie_bian
create implication xie_bian_(blushing_scholars) -> xie_bian
create implication fan_wujiu_(broken_blossoms) -> fan_wujiu
create implication fan_wujiu_(far_east_wind) -> fan_wujiu
create implication fan_wujiu_(qilin_merchant) -> fan_wujiu
create implication fan_wujiu_(flying_guillotine) -> fan_wujiu
create implication fan_wujiu_(master_yin_yang) -> fan_wujiu
create implication fan_wujiu_(brilliant_polaris) -> fan_wujiu
create implication fan_wujiu_(blushing_scholars) -> fan_wujiu
create implication fan_wujiu_(requiem) -> fan_wujiu
Thing 1 and Thing 2 of the Wu Chang duo implications.
Oh, that's almost 100 new BURs. That's almost 100 new BURs in a day.
Updated by nonamethanks
schule said:
First of all, thank you for making this. I knew these tags were always pretty messy but had no idea of the scope since I only really uploaded a select few characters.
Yeah. It was a huge mess. Which was a darn shame as an outsider, because it made it very hard for me to ID characters when I got ahold of fanart from Weibo or wherever to upload, much less their costumes, and a lot of them are very pretty. I'm hoping this BUR will help get things on track at least.
I know you said you don't know the series (and I'd imagine that's the majority) so just tegarding Wu Chang, the term refers to two characters. They're based off of actual Chinese underworld deities, and for the most part I see them tagged separately as Xie Bian (the "White Guard") and Fan Wujiu (the "Black Guard"). The tag should overall just be phased out in favor of tagging them individually.
Yeah, I had no idea. If they're generally tagged as separate people (and are), then I'd definitely agree with that assessment. Another thing to fix on you guys' end, I guess. But seriously, I'm glad I could help. These tags are really messy.
nonamethanks said:
Oh, that's almost 100 new BURs. That's almost 100 new BURs in a day.
In hindsight, now that I've actually slept off the three-four hours it took me to do all these, splitting the BURs was not one of my better ideas. Sorry about that.
The bulk update request #41786 (forum #358420) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #41787 (forum #358421) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #41788 (forum #358422) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #41790 (forum #358424) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #41791 (forum #358425) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
