Posted under General
post #10669572
post #10669577
post #10669629
post #10669642
The drawings are of good quality and anatomically correct, and they present a canonical pose for the character. The site has many approved drawings of terrible quality and anatomical inaccuracies, with simplistic situations. And these aren't approved?
post #10668605
post #10668601
post #10668580
post #10668578
post #10668562
post #10668548
post #10668535
post #10668528
post #10668502
post #10668481
post #10668432
post #10668385
post #10668368
post #10668352
post #10668165
i dont really see why all of these were rejected asides from the last two (which i assume is just cause theyre gore but theres plenty of guro on this site and these last two are very tame compared to the others ive seen on this site that got approved, such as this one: post #10669991). mostly everything i posted here seems to be of equivalent quality to the average video or artwork on this site too so i dont really get it. the only other reason i can see is source but nowhere in the help:upload rules does it state a source is outright required and i dont have a source on hand for many of these since these are stuff ive come across and downloaded. hell the last two are from an artist that deleted all of their accounts, so theres no way to get a source for that one.
Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance:
post #9484226
post #8651211
post #7660387
post #10652480
post #10655095
post #10660177
post #10663463
Any reason why these didn't go through? Especially as the 2nd post is official art?
AnonStatus said in forum #415588:
post #10668605
post #10668601
post #10668580
post #10668578
post #10668562
post #10668548
post #10668535
post #10668528
post #10668502
post #10668481
post #10668432
post #10668385
post #10668368
post #10668352
post #10668165i dont really see why all of these were rejected asides from the last two (which i assume is just cause theyre gore but theres plenty of guro on this site and these last two are very tame compared to the others ive seen on this site that got approved, such as this one: post #10669991). mostly everything i posted here seems to be of equivalent quality to the average video or artwork on this site too so i dont really get it. the only other reason i can see is source but nowhere in the help:upload rules does it state a source is outright required and i dont have a source on hand for many of these since these are stuff ive come across and downloaded. hell the last two are from an artist that deleted all of their accounts, so theres no way to get a source for that one.
Plenty of these you could have definitely provided a source.
Like for the P&S video by Ploxy, you could have used the link from Mr Ploxy's Newgrounds page or the Pixiv page that links the preview. It certainly would be better source than what's there currently.
For future uploads, look on the artist's pages for the sources. Twitter, Pixiv, Newgrounds, etc.
Also some of those posts are definitely "Borderline Content", which is content that usually doesn't get approved. You can see below.
help:upload rules
Not all of them are Border Line, but the unusual fetish ones definitely are.
I'm not sure why any of these posts weren't approved. Any feedback would be extremely helpful.
post #10615049 is still deleted despite post #10615059, post #10615069 and post #10615078 making the cut. Any feedback would be nice.
Cudcuds said in forum #415824:
Plenty of these you could have definitely provided a source.
Like for the P&S video by Ploxy, you could have used the link from Mr Ploxy's Newgrounds page or the Pixiv page that links the preview. It certainly would be better source than what's there currently.For future uploads, look on the artist's pages for the sources. Twitter, Pixiv, Newgrounds, etc.
Also some of those posts are definitely "Borderline Content", which is content that usually doesn't get approved. You can see below.
help:upload rules
Not all of them are Border Line, but the unusual fetish ones definitely are.
Cudcuds said in forum #415824:
Plenty of these you could have definitely provided a source.
Like for the P&S video by Ploxy, you could have used the link from Mr Ploxy's Newgrounds page or the Pixiv page that links the preview. It certainly would be better source than what's there currently.For future uploads, look on the artist's pages for the sources. Twitter, Pixiv, Newgrounds, etc.
Also some of those posts are definitely "Borderline Content", which is content that usually doesn't get approved. You can see below.
help:upload rules
Not all of them are Border Line, but the unusual fetish ones definitely are.
like i said i did not have a source since this is stuff i just came across and downloaded but if it doesnt get approved cause of that i guess theres no reason for me to upload stuff ill just stick to editing
Cudcuds said in forum #415824:
Plenty of these you could have definitely provided a source.
Like for the P&S video by Ploxy, you could have used the link from Mr Ploxy's Newgrounds page or the Pixiv page that links the preview. It certainly would be better source than what's there currently.For future uploads, look on the artist's pages for the sources. Twitter, Pixiv, Newgrounds, etc.
The file at the source link has to match the file on Danbooru. A file from a third-party source may be different from the one at the original source, so if the Newgrounds video was downloaded from somewhere else, the Newgrounds source won't necessarily be correct. You would need to compare the video on Danbooru with the original Newgrounds video before changing the source to Newgrounds.
AnonStatus said in forum #415588:
the only other reason i can see is source but nowhere in the help:upload rules does it state a source is outright required
That's because help:upload rules is about what you're allowed and not allowed to post, not about how you should tag and source your posts. For basic tagging/sourcing expectations, you should refer to help:upload.
Blank_User said in forum #415962:
The file at the source link has to match the file on Danbooru. A file from a third-party source may be different from the one at the original source, so if the Newgrounds video was downloaded from somewhere else, the Newgrounds source won't necessarily be correct. You would need to compare the video on Danbooru with the original Newgrounds video before changing the source to Newgrounds.
That's because help:upload rules is about what you're allowed and not allowed to post, not about how you should tag and source your posts. For basic tagging/sourcing expectations, you should refer to help:upload.
AnonStatus said in forum #415866:
like i said i did not have a source since this is stuff i just came across and downloaded but if it doesnt get approved cause of that i guess theres no reason for me to upload stuff ill just stick to editing
It's for future reference. It's always better to use Twitter link when you can.
For Newgrounds posts, you can actually download the video itself if you inspect element the page.
For sources you can't access normally, you can try using the wayback machine too if you can.
You can't really do anything about those deleted posts now, but in the future make sure you got your sources in order.
Cudcuds said in forum #415967:
You can't really do anything about those deleted posts now, but in the future make sure you got your sources in order.
The posts can still be appealed, though it would be best to hold off on doing so until the sources are found and verified. Of course, some of those posts are very unlikely to make it through simply because the quality just isn't good enough.
I think all posts by bordfunker133 are worthy of being approved.
I'd also kindly ask for someone to look through my deleteds, more than half of them are worthy of being up
Those posts are worthy
post #9829101
post #9865068
post #9857693
post #9843789
post #9832097
Would like to know why these didn't go through? I personally don't see nothing wrong with them and both are in good quality
[Pkmn, mainly Gardevoir/Gallade alternate designs.
Some were approved but likely I felt the rest were deleted due to time & luck perhaps (some of their posts [outside this list] were approved though). Artist doesn't upload anymore also.
Just curious overall if there's anything wrong?]
post #10088898 / post #10088899 (child)
post #10088891
post #10088887
post #10088880
post #10088841 / post #10088842 (child)
post #10088828
post #10088827
post #10264863
post #10088865 (Lack of Gardevoir Yaoi, how sad)
post #10658695
post #10658676
perfectly good animations
