Fake Time Lapse?
twitter #2001480748029906974
Posted under General
Fake Time Lapse?
twitter #2001480748029906974
Torrearcilla said:
Fake Time Lapse?
twitter #2001480748029906974
This definitely seems like a real timelapse to me. The artist does a lot of adjustments as they work and even redraws a few parts, which you rarely see in timelapses where someone is tracing over AI. I don't see anything that indicates AI in the drawing itself either.
I was a little suspicious about the "AI" in the artist's username, but (from google translate, so admittedly I may be wrong) I'm pretty sure it actually refers to the one of the artist's vtuber personas being an AI in lore.
Got told melissa v2 (and post #8975256 in particular) is AI. Need more opinions on this.
post #10443705
Flagged without a tag, and reaproved but it's still from a "do not upload" artist.
ion288 said:
post #10443705
Flagged without a tag, and reaproved but it's still from a "do not upload" artist.
Twitter bio has a disclaimer stating that AI is used in both their images and videos.
Tagged but unable to flag due to the post being flagged less than 3 days ago.
ion288 said:
post #10443705
Flagged without a tag, and reaproved but it's still from a "do not upload" artist.
Feels like something's funny going on, it looks like there is quite a bit of inconsistency between panels (red stripes around collar, number of petals on kanzashi, ear swab's end), not to mention 4-fingered hand of Sensei with eerily long index finger.
GranAutismo said:
Got told melissa v2 (and post #8975256 in particular) is AI. Need more opinions on this.
I don’t see anything particularly suspicious in that post or their other artworks. Did the person who told you about it have any reasoning behind their accusation?
Placeholder1996 said:
There’s no record of that post being flagged (same for all the other posts in the parent-child relationship), nor was it ever tagged with ai-assisted or ai-generated. None of that artist’s posts are currently tagged as either generated or assisted. Do you have proof for your claim?
I don't keep records, do I need to start? I crossexamine every post on my subreddit when a new name appears. Ipuu was labeled as using AI somewhere that I trust, which is a limited amount of sites. I added his name to the blacklist for my subreddit because it was labeled as AI somewhere else. I'm not blinding accusing people of using AI, I'm going off of reports I've received on my subs. If it wasn't labeled as AI on danbooru, then idk where I got it from. I've been looking since my last comment.
This is a screenshot I was sent months ago about Unfairr, but people here told me I was witchhunting.
https://files.catbox.moe/8lzbiy.webp
WRS even reported my account here for not having proof, even though people have called him out for being a clown on this very thread.
Knowledge_Seeker said:
Then don't make the accusation. It's as simple as that. You can't expect randos on Danbooru to be any more assed to pay just to verify, especially on the words of someone prone to crying wolf as is. If you can't be bothered to bring the burden of proof, then no one here is going to bothered to indulge you.
This guy loves accusing random artists and expects us to do the work for 'em. Be wary.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/networking.asp
Hope this helps.
Does it feel good to misconstrue someone's words to make a point? I should remind you that the "people" in question was one single other person who was doing the same thing as you, but seems to have improved since regarding how they bring up artists to be checked in this topic, as far as I've last checked their posts. You, on the other hand, have learned nothing and continue to be antagonistic.
When Unfairr was originally brought to this topic, I agreed with you that there was a degree of AI involvement (forum #359768) however Danbooru users are incapable of nuance and I said that it would be AI-assisted which is not against the rules to upload, not that it is hard-generation. Users have decided though that the degree of assist is not enough and their works have been flagged, and that's fine. I even helped point out the actual time that they started dabbling in AI (forum #370937). None of these posts opened out hostile, but I got hostile replies each time I posted here.
Unfairr isn't my problem with you. If you have adequate proof, I will back you wholeheartedly. If you do nothing but lie and antagonise artists, then I have a problem with you. We don't need any more untoward hate because of users who don't think before they act.
I don't keep records, do I need to start?
Not even sure why you need to be told something so obvious.
Would it be possible to somehow flag AI poster "art" accounts similar to the artists who have takedown requests, so that images can't be uploaded from them? I try to remember to check first but I upload a lot of posts and there have been a few times now where I noticed right after uploading from an unfamiliar artist that they were actually an AI account when I checked their tag and saw that it was empty. I don't know if that would be feasible or not.
pacifica said:
Would it be possible to somehow flag AI poster "art" accounts similar to the artists who have takedown requests, so that images can't be uploaded from them? I try to remember to check first but I upload a lot of posts and there have been a few times now where I noticed right after uploading from an unfamiliar artist that they were actually an AI account when I checked their tag and saw that it was empty. I don't know if that would be feasible or not.
No, because artists might start using AI (meaning old stuff becomes unuploadable), or they may stop, or it may be a false positive.
Also banned artists are still uploadable, the posts just get taken down immediately.
This artist, Karintoun, is known for her amazing watercolor paintings, and this appears to be the very first digital artwork she’s posted. In the comments, she simply wrote “AI.”
I can tell it’s probably not AI-generated because of her distinctive character design and painting style. However, one thing still bothers me: the signature isn’t the same as the one she used before.
Harrinive said:
This artist, Karintoun, is known for her amazing watercolor paintings, and this appears to be the very first digital artwork she’s posted. In the comments, she simply wrote “AI.”
I can tell it’s probably not AI-generated because of her distinctive character design and painting style. However, one thing still bothers me: the signature isn’t the same as the one she used before.
sorry to say, but that's likely AI. There are melty lines all over, particularly noticeable in the eyes and bangs.
Placeholder1996 said:
sorry to say, but that's likely AI. There are melty lines all over, particularly noticeable in the eyes and bangs.
I see. That makes sense. Thank you.
I saw that you have tagged it with ai-generated. Anything else I should do for this post before it is deleted?
Updated by Harrinive
Harrinive said:
I see. That makes sense. Thank you.
I saw that you have tagged it with ai-generated. Anything else I should do for this post before it is deleted?
no, it will likely go unapproved over the next three days and then get autodeleted.
Most certainly ai, but still sharing post #10460572 here just to be sure.
applin said:
Most certainly ai, but still sharing post #10460572 here just to be sure.
You’re correct, it’s AI. Too many artifacts on the hair, ornaments, gloves… pretty much all over the image. "MERRRY" being the cherry on top.
The usual. Her hair does seem to loop in on itself and some of the strap buckles looks smudged. On the other hand, artist goes back since before AI was a thing and is outspoken against AI.
