hello, can anyone please review these posts? in case no one seen them yet
post #10187502
post #10187517
post #10187523
post #10187526
thank you in advance
Posted under General
hello, can anyone please review these posts? in case no one seen them yet
post #10187502
post #10187517
post #10187523
post #10187526
thank you in advance
mob99 said:
hello, can anyone please review these posts? in case no one seen them yet
post #10187502
post #10187517
post #10187523
post #10187526thank you in advance
and these as well while we're at it
post #10194968
post #10194974
post #10194978
Hello, I'd like to ask about this deleted post of mine. Similar artworks by the same artist with the same quality were previously approved, and so was another post of the same characters in a similar pose.
mob99 said:
hello, can anyone please review these posts? in case no one seen them yet
post #10187502
post #10187517
post #10187523
post #10187526thank you in advance
mob99 said:
and these as well while we're at it
post #10194968
post #10194974
post #10194978
Please only ask about deleted posts. The posts you listed are still pending, with some not being even an hour old.
Though if you're concerned over how many approvers have seen your post, you can click 'Moderation' at the bottom of the page of a post. It'll show any times your post was seen, if any.
Unbreakable said:
Categorization, so you can search for it or avoid it/blacklist it.
We also have an off-topic tag for example so it's not the only one.
all of my uploads were deleted with only reason being stated as "ai"
so there's a tag for ai_generated and ai_assisted on the site, I tagged the images I was uploading as such...is this allowed or not?
post #10187427
post #10187459
post #10187478
post #10187487
post #10187492
Ambers said:
so there's a tag for ai_generated and ai_assisted on the site, I tagged the images I was uploading as such...is this allowed or not?
no, fully ai-generated art is not allowed. as unbreakable said, the ai-generated tag exists solely for categorization.
wingdings said:
no, fully ai-generated art is not allowed. as unbreakable said, the ai-generated tag exists solely for categorization.
so what are you categorizing if it can't be uploaded?
I did clean these up in CSP a lot, so I guess I should tag them as ai_assisted?
edit: I just changed the tags, can these be reviewed?
we keep deleted posts in the database for archival purposes and in the event they're brought back to active status, so it's helpful to describe their properties. for example, you wouldn't want someone accidentally appealing an ai-generated post because there's no tag for it.
wingdings said:
we keep deleted posts in the database for archival purposes and in the event they're brought back to active status, so it's helpful to describe their properties. for example, you wouldn't want someone accidentally appealing an ai-generated post because there's no tag for it.
I see. I believe my uploads qualify as ai_assisted due to the hours I spent cleaning up the artifacts in CSP and adding a few details (like their nails). Is it possible to have these reviewed? If they are rejected, I'll understand.
post #10162211 (9 approvers)
post #10163964 (8 approvers)
post #10167810 (currenlty 7 approvers)
Hi, i can understand the 1st one being questionable, but the other 2 are very well drawn imo.
Hello
I’d like to kindly ask for a re-evaluation of some artworks that were not approved. I believe they meet the site's quality standards and could be valuable additions to the gallery.
Here are the post IDs I’d like to request a review for:
[post #9968216
I just wanted to make sure these posts weren’t overlooked, as I feel they have merit.
post #9839953
post #9843601
post #9908027
post #9908052
post #9916492
post #9996822
post #9996878
post #10163304
are any of these posts low quality or did they not pass the queue because they weren't really danbooru taste? i wanna say the sixth one looks too sketchy and the last one isn't up to anatomical standards, but i'd prefer not to have to guess why
post #10181053 (8 approvers)
post #10181044 (9 approvers)
post #10181032 (8 approvers)
post #10181395 (7 approvers)
Can someone tell me what's exactly wrong with these? They're pretty well drawn in comparasion
Updated by TheGamingRodent
post #10167972 (only 9 approvers checkeded this post on appeal)
post #9473184
post #9284934
post #9009903
post #8985914
post #10090580
post #10077768 (Similar post #10195348 got approved)
post #10178516
nice work
post #10184905
Most of the artist's works can be viewed
post #10183904 post #10183905
Despite its small size, the painting is excellent.