The bulk update request #3882 (forum #175625) has been approved by @evazion.
Posted under General
The bulk update request #3882 (forum #175625) has been approved by @evazion.
iridescent_slime said:
Pools are for posts that are either part of a series or which share a unifying theme. This pool ("Danbooru GET") is neither. Just like the long-gone "Swimming in the Pools" and "Tag Panic" pools, it's based entirely on meta information from Danbooru's gallery. We don't do that anymore.
I could live with it if it were limited to million post GETs, as those are somewhat interesting and there is at least some usefulness in being able to browse them easily. As it stands though, this pool is just a bunch of random shitposts from 10+ years ago that weren't interesting GETs even back then.
The bulk update request #3813 (forum #175179) has been approved by @evazion.
I've recently brought that up on Discord while attempting to purge the childish tag and this "thing" comes: possible redundancy of brother and sister as a tag.
BUR #4060 has been approved by @evazion.
mass update pool:5611 -> -pool:5611
pool #5611 - "Imouto" - technically is for characters behaving like younger sisters, but in truth more than half of the posts are for a specific character (pool:Imouto kyon_no_imouto) and there's all kind of posts in there: solo posts, pantyshots, nude pics with no dialog nor any way to tell the character is behaving younger than they are, and of course the obligatory streak of incest porn. Hardly worth keeping around, especially since we have siblings and derivative tags.
EDIT: The bulk update request #4060 (forum #176637) has been approved by @evazion.
Updated by DanbooruBot
The bulk update request #4060 (forum #176637) has been approved by @evazion.
Should we revisit forum #75666 then?
Looks like we had an imouto tag before, then we replaced it with a pool, then the pool became garbage too. This is why I don't believe in turning subjective tags into pools. If a tag is shit then making it a pool isn't going to make it less shit. If we want a tag for the concept or stereotype or an imouto, then just make it a tag and keep it well gardened.
I created that pool at some point years ago, but on second thought I think we can delete it. Perhaps tags would be better for that, and the pool is missing hundreds of posts.
I populated the tags pokemon_move and pokemon_ability today.
Post counts:
The bulk update request #3814 (forum #175180) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
pool #4169
pool #2233
pool #13382
Are character groups pools like these really necessary? Supposedly, pools shouldn't exist in place of tag combinations (my proposal for a Kancolle character pool a while back got rejected on that ground). I also remember that way back there was a similar pool with Marisa, Alice, and Patchouli that got deleted.
Is this pool really useful? Should it better off as a tag? Or just nuke?
SSJG said:
pool #4169
pool #2233
pool #13382
Are character groups pools like these really necessary? Supposedly, pools shouldn't exist in place of tag combinations (my proposal for a Kancolle character pool a while back got rejected on that ground). I also remember that way back there was a similar pool with Marisa, Alice, and Patchouli that got deleted.
For reference, there's an entire section in pool_group:touhou for those pools.
I personally think some may be worth keeping? Mainly the broader ones such as pool #4169 or pool #2353, where they group many kinds of searches together.
Couldn't this just be a tag? It's certainly objective enough.
evazion said:
BUR #3814 has been rejected.
mass update pool:3026 -> hypocrisy -pool:3026
Replacing pool #3026 (You're the Last Person I Want to Hear That From!) with hypocrisy. Hypocrisy is a pretty straightforward concept and irony is already a tag.
Excuse my tardiness.
Irony and hypocrisy are not the same. comment #734951 explains it fairly well.
pool #16802 - Buff women
pool #16803 - Sextoy handjob
pool #16804 - Looking down
@Lawbruh, we generally don't make pools for things that can be replicated by tag searches (and no, needing 3+ tags to replicate it isn't good enough).
Apologies for the double post, but....
More pools redundant with tag searches: