pool #15856 could be a tag
Posted under General
pool #15856 could be a tag
Noticed that the tag hotel yamato also has a pool. (pool #11794) Should we keep the tag or keep the pool? Not sure if this is the right place to ask.
Since it's more similar to something like night battle idiot and and less subjective than something like Christmas Cake Ashigara, I'll make it a tag.
pool #15850
This one could easily be a tag.
SSJG said:
pool #15850
This one could easily be a tag.
+1
Perhaps, hate speech? Since most of its contents have characters expressing hate (e.g. post #987294, as in "YOU'RE A NUISANCE" -> "calling other character negatively" -> expressing hate) or encouraging violence (e.g. post #1623606, as in "every touch will cost you a finger" -> "threatening one character with violence") towards other characters. Swear words can still go to profanity tho.
...oh wait, there's humiliation, too.
"Hate speech" is a more narrowly defined term in English and doesn't encompass all harsh words, more those towards those of different ethnicities and sexual orientations. The humiliation tag doesn't appear to apply to the whole pool because it appears to be used for posts where the victim is present, and the pool has a lot of posts where it's just the bully.
pool #16988 - "Weird Shit"
Personal use pool created by @Hbby, it's just some Futa stuff.
pool #16964 "videod"
Exact same as deleted pool #16834, but with a typo.
pool #17028 is redundant and is covered by the tags squatting and spread_legs. Seems to be a favorites pool or a user trying to get around the search tag limit
iori98 said:
pool #17028 is redundant and is covered by the tags squatting and spread_legs. Seems to be a favorites pool or a user trying to get around the search tag limit
Given the amount of posts under squatting spread_legs, yeah. Deleted.
pool #16998 doesn't seem to be an outright favorites pool, but does seem to be a pet pool maintained mostly by one person. It's far too broad, being any two servants of the same class shown together, and the amount of things it misses makes to look like a favorites pool.
It sounds like trait connection where the trait is having the same servant class, except in a lot of these posts the connection seems coincidental.
pool #7581 It just seems too short for a comic pool, unless there are more people will put in
pool #16574?
Its almost certainly not going to be continued.
Question... if series-type pools become superfluous due to reorganization (usually by later grouping everything into the same "series" pool), do I need to mention them here, or do I just depopulate them entirely (to zero posts) and the system will handle it automatically?
This might be a potentially recurring issue for Twitter-hosted comics, where related posts in a series (or earlier posts) may not be apparent to the original uploader(s) due to everything being arranged in one single gigantic 'timeline'.
In this regard, consider pool #16606 and pool #16607. Original uploader decided to organize them in two separate pools. When I came across later chapters in the series I thought they might be better organized as a single pool for all the chapters, so I created the Tales of the Holy Elfroid Hylodom pool and stuck them all in there. This does end up leaving pool #16606 and pool #16607 completely superfluous though. I suppose I should have depopulated them then, but I didn't want to step on the toes of the original creator of those two pools.
Anyway, do I just depopulate them now and mention them here? Or will just depopulating them in itself be enough, and the system will delete them automatically?
You can depopulate them, but you also need to delete them. We don't do anything automatically. When you edit a pool there's a "delete" entry in the topbar.
Pools should be merged if they're about the same series, it's no use for us to keep them in separate ones, and it makes it harder to read a single series in one go.
nonamethanks said:
You can depopulate them, but you also need to delete them. We don't do anything automatically. When you edit a pool there's a "delete" entry in the topbar.
Pools should be merged if they're about the same series, it's no use for us to keep them in separate ones, and it makes it harder to read a single series in one go.
Alright, done. Thanks for telling me what to do. In the future I will also depopulate and delete such pools, in that order (if I am sure that they are superfluous).
Updated
pool #12660. Merged with pool #12638