Danbooru

Pointless Pools

Posted under General

user 358670

anon153 said:
I think we can leave pool #5745 as a subpool of pool #756. We'd have to rename it to "Heart-warming petting" though.

Not all instances would qualify as heartwarming though. Some are pretty neutral emotion wise.

Gollgagh said:
I'd like to bring this into consideration for removal again

Pool represents a somewhat complicated tag search (to be inclusive) and it doesn't seem like the worst concept for a pool.

I lean towards keeping it.

Reply
S1eth

"Petting Girls" could just as well be a tag that implicates petting, but even then, is it necessary?
Adding "girl" to petting is just like the female tag which doesn't exist for a reason. The vast majority of (petting) images is of girls and who would be bothered by the occasional animal/pokemon/boy petting? Actually, it's much harder finding images of boys.

Reply
Gollgagh

S1eth said:
"Petting Girls" could just as well be a tag that implicates petting, but even then, is it necessary?
Adding "girl" to petting is just like the female tag which doesn't exist for a reason. The vast majority of (petting) images is of girls and who would be bothered by the occasional animal/pokemon/boy petting? Actually, it's much harder finding images of boys.

yes, exactly

petting + 1girl does exactly the same thing

Updated

Reply
1 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 165