Posted under General
ion288 said:
There are 204 posts in that pool tagged loli. So close to ten percent. pool #1536 is for nudity in non-sexual situations. Weather
a naked child acts in a sexual way matters little for the loli/shota tag. Though there are plenty examples of child rating:q that probably should have the tag.
Ah, okay. I was harboring the misunderstanding that only explicit/borderline questionable images were supposed to be tagged loli. Somehow, I didn't read the part on the wiki about how all NSFW children are supposed to have loli tags, I stopped reading at the first line. Sorry for that.
bucolic said:
Ah, okay. I was harboring the misunderstanding that only explicit/borderline questionable images were supposed to be tagged loli. Somehow, I didn't read the part on the wiki about how all NSFW children are supposed to have loli tags, I stopped reading at the first line. Sorry for that.
That's fair. It seems like someone recently made an edit to the loli wiki that could lead users to think that blatantly sexual images needn't be tagged as loli unless there's explicit nudity.
Would anyone object to me reverting this edit?
post #3064930 and a ton of explicit images by ginhaha that have yashajin_ai in them?
loli/rating check:
post #45390 - partially see-through clothes and licking popsicle
bucolic said:
post #3064930 and a ton of explicit images by ginhaha that have yashajin_ai in them?
That particular post isn't loli.
archaist said:
Can't really tell. She's too saggyness and the skinniness doesn't help.
kittey said:
Not loli? Looks more like a 13/14 year old.
post #3150302
Again tagged just in case
yelite said:
Unsure about this. Appears to be casual nudity at a glance but it could also be suggestive.
oppai_loli or not loli?
