Ourobouro said:
explicit warning
post #7386789questionable warning
post #6301985
post #6595459
Image 1. No
Image 2. No
Image 3. Possibly yes, top half is loli drawn but bottom half has wide hips and a bigger butt.
Posted under General
Ourobouro said:
explicit warning
post #7386789questionable warning
post #6301985
post #6595459
Image 1. No
Image 2. No
Image 3. Possibly yes, top half is loli drawn but bottom half has wide hips and a bigger butt.
Are all of these really loli? I can see it maybe in one case at most.
post #7795398
post #7795397
post #7071686
post #6997189
post #6964814
post #6949567
post #7700622 Not sure.
santander said:
They look too small and young for me, I'd say it's shota indeed.
Want to make sure, is this shota or not shota post #7871170
Freshblink said:
Want to make sure, is this shota or not shota post #7871170
it is
xkcd said:
No, not even close.
parasol said:
They probably used the "undo" option in the tag history.
denliner27 said:
Yes.
santander said:
She has the legs of a 200cm tall amazon and the torso of a toddler 
tapnek said:
In that case, it's shota.
Hideri Kanzaki is not a shota.
JApple said:
Hideri Kanzaki is not a shota.
We don't care what he is canonically, only what he looks like.
caps7 said:
We don't care what he is canonically, only what he looks like.
Based on other opinions on shota-tagging I've read in this thread, I don't think the post in question (post #2987323) should be tagged with shota. He doesn't look any different than any other teenage otoko no ko and is even roughly the same size as the fully-grown woman he's with. I think all of the Kanzaki Hideri posts tagged with shota (there's 7 right now) should be looked at again because most of them don't really seem to fit in my opinion.