elff1493 said:
post #6034313 dose itty bitty titty count as loli like this
I find stuff like this a bit hard to judge, but I lean towards no
Posted under General
elff1493 said:
post #6034313 dose itty bitty titty count as loli like this
I find stuff like this a bit hard to judge, but I lean towards no
Not sure about this one.
The "loli" tag was added by a random blue user who later got neg for adding this tag to every post. However, the tag was not removed over time, so I ask those who know to double check
Do either of these 2 meet loli standards?
Blank_User said:
wide enough shoulder.
post #8058003 might be foot fetish, should it be loli tagged?
post #6846178 top half looks loli but rear doesn't, should it stay tagged?
Updated by Freshblink
elff1493 said:
Definitely loli.
Does post #8068879 need shota where it's merely suggestive?
Feels borderline but doesn't Not feel shota. He doesn't look aged down per se but he does look shotafied, idk. I think it's becuase the artist made his body seem smaller overall though he's still muscular.
The situation is definitely suggestive, even the commentary has the artist saying as much. Just need a second opinion.
post #4374297 is loli necessary?
GayandStoned said:
looks like it should count to me
Freshblink said:
post #4374297 is loli necessary?
imo nah
Freshblink said:
post #4374297 is loli necessary?
Definitely not
post #8072469 Just going to run a check on my upload.
post #8073644? added it just to be safe.
post #6467923
I can't see the post on danbooru, but on gelbooru it doesn't look like loli
post #8074335
In general I have a lot of doubts about the Lucky Star characters.
FubukiKai said:
post #8073644? added it just to be safe.
unsure
anonbl said:
nah, removed
SEGAkane said:
no imo