WestTxTapper said:
post #1400882
I originally rated it safe, but on second thought, is it questionable? Even though no nipples can be seen, does the amount of breast exposure warrant a change?
Seems fine to rate Safe.
Posted under General
WestTxTapper said:
post #1400882
I originally rated it safe, but on second thought, is it questionable? Even though no nipples can be seen, does the amount of breast exposure warrant a change?
Seems fine to rate Safe.
Looks Q to me.
post #439499 can be Safe, right?
jjj14 said:
post #439499 can be Safe, right?
Yup. Although the girl is naked, there is nothing sexual about it. I'll go ahead and change the rating to Safe.
post #1310741 - Fingering (albeit under panties) and vaginal juices? Seems more E than Q to me.
post #63234 - A loli just standing nude: Q or E?
This is not directly rating related, but I only have one image in question at the moment. It's undeniably rating:e, but is it rape?: post #171181
Would such be better suited to a "Rape Check Thread" (or something more encompassing for charged tags with contextually sensitive outliers)?
post #1458502 looks loli-ish to me.
NeverGonnaGive said:
This is not directly rating related, but I only have one image in question at the moment. It's undeniably rating:e, but is it rape?: post #171181
Not rape. There has to be very clear signs (struggle, terror, etc.).
jjj14 said:
post #1458502 looks loli-ish to me.
Long legs, looks more stylized than loli. Wouldn't rate it E either.
And could someone take a look at my previous post in this thread?
It's definitely explicit enough for loli but wondering if the rating warrants a Q or E.
Kadoya said:
It's definitely explicit enough for loli but wondering if the rating warrants a Q or E.
Q.
If the pussy is barely visible (like in this image), or just a slit (cleft of venus), it's most likely questionable.
Seems like clearly non-sexual nudity and thus an S? I'm still getting the hang of this. Thanks!