Posted under General
Kadoya said:
Someone changed post #1622926 back to Q but I can't revert it since someone locked the rating
For future reference you could have just unlocked the rating yourself and then changed it. Rating/note locking and unlocking work for anyone Builder+.
Well, they please themselves, but genitals aren't shown.
post #1717321
Safe according to checklist, but sensual enough to make me wonder
post #1605597
I would change this, but it's tagged tag loli and I don't have a privileged account.
Changed these two to Rating:e because of the genitalia
post #1730451
post #1717162
Probably still rating:q but just checking while I'm here
post #1636581
Just Toosaka Rin in a slightly skimpy outfit. Rating locked at Questionable. Parent is Safe.
Edit: pool #1823, Toks!
Updated
Two girls 69'ing. NCAA Gundam uploaded as E. I changed to it to Q. Nowandthentai complained. Kikimaru changed it back to E.
It's clearly consensual and there are no fluids or genitals in sight. In my opinion, the portrayal should be considered "restrained and tasteful", suggesting a Q rating.
Updated
In that case, what is this item in howto:rate about?
Does that only apply to people who are getting it on fully clothed? I thought that one of the key points of howto:rate was that the degree of explicitness isn't directly proportional to the degree of nudity.
I rated these two (post#1855569 and post#1855566) as "safe", but I have to say...
I'm not exactly sure how you rate pregnant pics when they're displayed like these. In particular, that Kaguya one.
One of those old rating-locked (and note-locked) posts. Looks Safe to me.
Was Questionable, changed to Safe, noticed open_shirt. Changed back to Q just to be sure, but probably should be Safe.
I'd say it's Safe and not even a border case. (Although it might qualify for the new "Risque" rating, if that happens.) We're not seeing any more boob than if she'd been wearing a typical bikini, she doesn't look aroused/naughty and her breasts are not the focus of the image.
Let me reiterate my standpoint from topic #12067: Despite its name, the Safe rating is not about a post being "safe" for anything. What it does mean is simply that eroticism, gentle or blunt, isn't the post's primary theme. To "err on the side of qaution" (or caution) is to miss the point.
Am I seeing things or is post #1913452 no panties and thus should be Explicit?
Nicolaos said:
Am I seeing things or is post #1913452 no panties and thus should be Explicit?
I can clearly see her pink panties so no?
Rating locked to Q, should be S.
May I ask why this Ahri image keeps getting hit with the Safe rating?
It's clearly questionable- you can see her massive cleavage and ass out in full view, and only a towel is covering the front of her body. She's fully nude otherwise. There's no argument for this to have a Safe rating other than that there aren't visible nipples, but that's not a very good argument.
NamelessChen said:
May I ask why this Ahri image keeps getting hit with the Safe rating?
It's clearly questionable- you can see her massive cleavage and ass out in full view, and only a towel is covering the front of her body. She's fully nude otherwise. There's no argument for this to have a Safe rating other than that there aren't visible nipples, but that's not a very good argument.
I totally agree with you.
