Danbooru

Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Monster OCG to TCG renames

Posted under Tags

Chimney said:

BUR #9113 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

Show

rename cyber_angel_vishnu -> cyber_angel_vrash
rename darklord_of_delight -> capricious_darklord
rename darklord_of_pleasure -> indulged_darklord
rename felice_lightsworn_archer -> felis_lightsworn_archer
rename harpie_lady_#1 -> harpie_lady_1
rename harpie_lady_#2 -> harpie_lady_2
rename harpie_lady_#3 -> harpie_lady_3
rename karakuri_soldier_mdl_1236_nisamu -> karakuri_soldier_mdl_236_nisamu
rename kuriba -> kuribah
rename kuribe -> kuribeh
rename kuribi -> kuribee
rename kuribu -> kuriboo_(yu-gi-oh!)
rename choco_magician_girl -> chocolate_magician_girl
rename meklord_army_of_grannel -> meklord_army_of_granel
rename meklord_emperor_grannel -> meklord_emperor_granel
create alias red-eyes_black_chick -> black_dragon's_chick
rename trickstar_holy_angel -> trickstar_holly_angel
rename zoodiac_lyca -> zoodiac_chakanine
rename zoodiac_rabbina -> zoodiac_bunnyblast
rename starve_venom_fusion_dragon -> starving_venom_fusion_dragon
rename golden_sarcophagus -> gold_sarcophagus
create alias curran_(yu-gi-oh!) -> ebon_magician_curran
create alias pikeru -> white_magician_pikeru
rename trickstar_catbat -> trickstar_black_catbat
rename trickstar_suite_devil -> trickstar_black_catbat

old fan translated names and typos/shortened names -> official names

Personally, I think some would be better as an alias instead of rename.
A lot of people still know "Black Dragon's Chick" as "Red-Eyes Black Chick", as it took way too long for the card to be renamed in TCG (I believe there are plenty of users interested in Yu-Gi-Oh that may not be in touch with current TCG). "Curran" and "Pikeru" could be aliases too, it's their names without their titles, and their tags were named like that in Danbooru for a long time.

mongirlfan said:

Personally, I think some would be better as an alias instead of rename.
A lot of people still know "Black Dragon's Chick" as "Red-Eyes Black Chick", as it took way too long for the card to be renamed in TCG (I believe there are plenty of users interested in Yu-Gi-Oh that may not be in touch with current TCG). "Curran" and "Pikeru" could be aliases too, it's their names without their titles, and their tags were named like that in Danbooru for a long time.

ok, i'll change those 3 and anymore you think should be an alias instead. Also what do you think should be done with ki-sikil and lil-la since their live/evil twin forms are 2 different cards but right now they share 1 tag

Chimney said:

ok, i'll change those 3 and anymore you think should be an alias instead. Also what do you think should be done with ki-sikil and lil-la since their live/evil twin forms are 2 different cards but right now they share 1 tag

Surely it is a more complicated case, and with similar cases we usually tag accordingly to the card only. Taking from example Gishki Emilia: the character have several different forms, like Dance Princess of the Nekroz, Nekroz of Gungnir, Nekroz of Sophia, etc. Based on this approach, the twins ki-sikil and lil-la would be divided into different tags, accordingly to the card the art is representing. I wouldn't say it's a perfect approach, but it's important for someone to be able to search for the Yu-Gi-Oh cards individually, even if some of them are the same character in-lore. It would be interesting to write in the card's wiki if a card has a direct relation with another, like the wiki of Dance Princess of the Nekroz stating it's the older version of Gishki Emilia.

As the twins have only Live and Evil counterparts, post #5138662 for example could be tagged with both Ki-Sikil_(yu-gi-oh!) and Live Twin Ki-sikil.

Updated

mongirlfan said:

Surely it is a more complicated case, and with similar cases we usually tag accordingly to the card only. Taking from example Gishki Emilia: the character have several different forms, like Dance Princess of the Nekroz, Nekroz of Gungnir, Nekroz of Sophia, etc. Based on this approach, the twins ki-sikil and lil-la would be divided into different tags, accordingly to the card the art is representing. I wouldn't say it's a perfect approach, but it's important for someone to be able to search for the Yu-Gi-Oh cards individually, even if some of them are the same character in-lore. It would be interesting to write in the card's wiki if a card has a direct relation with another, like the wiki of Dance Princess of the Nekroz stating it's the older version of Gishki Emilia.

As the twins have only Live and Evil counterparts, post #5138662 for example could be tagged with both Ki-Sikil_(yu-gi-oh!) and Live Twin Ki-sikil.

so using gishki emilia would the original monster's wiki be something like this where it links to the other forms

Other forms

then on the variant's wiki it would explain and link back to the original monster like for Nekroz of Sophia
An alternate form of Gishki Emilia combined with Sophia Goddess of Rebirth

I think having a base character tag would be good like you suggested since right now people sometimes tag the original card with the variant so it makes it hard to look for pictures of just the original. although it might be a bit hard to do for some cards like the winged dragon of ra and the winged dragon of ra sphere mode

Chimney said:

so using gishki emilia would the original monster's wiki be something like this where it links to the other forms

Other forms

then on the variant's wiki it would explain and link back to the original monster like for Nekroz of Sophia
An alternate form of Gishki Emilia combined with Sophia Goddess of Rebirth

I think having a base character tag would be good like you suggested since right now people sometimes tag the original card with the variant so it makes it hard to look for pictures of just the original. although it might be a bit hard to do for some cards like the winged dragon of ra and the winged dragon of ra sphere mode

I think the wiki for Nekroz of Sophia would be more appropriate like this: "An alternate form of Dance Princess of the Nekroz combined with Sophia Goddess of Rebirth", as Nekroz of Sophia is based off specifically Dance Princess of the Nekroz instead of her younger and first form, Gishki Emilia. Then, if the users clicks Dance Princess of the Nekroz's wiki, they will see the card's relation to Gishki Emilia. All wikis related to the character could just have a "See also" or "Other forms" section listing the other YGO cards that represent the same character in-lore.

The family of tags is basically like this:

Also a tip, it's always good to check the Yu-Gi-Oh wiki as well, specially the Trivia sections. They often make it clear if a card has a relation to another, specially for cases like this, as Gishki Emilia isn't part of the Nekroz archetype, so it isn't obvious at first that she's actually the same character in-lore as Dance Princess of the Nekroz.

Updated

mongirlfan said:

I think the wiki for Nekroz of Sophia would be more appropriate like this: "An alternate form of Dance Princess of the Nekroz combined with Sophia Goddess of Rebirth", as Nekroz of Sophia is based off specifically Dance Princess of the Nekroz instead of her younger and first form, Gishki Emilia. Then, if the users clicks Dance Princess of the Nekroz's wiki, they will see the card's relation to Gishki Emilia. All wikis related to the character could just have a "See also" or "Other forms" section listing the other YGO cards that represent the same character in-lore.

The family of tags is basically like this:

Also a tip, it's always good to check the Yu-Gi-Oh wiki as well, specially the Trivia sections. They often make it clear if a card has a relation to another, specially for cases like this, as Gishki Emilia isn't part of the Nekroz archetype, so it isn't obvious at first that she's actually the same character in-lore as Dance Princess of the Nekroz.

Thanks for the tip about the trivia section on the wiki, i'll get started on a few of them later, probably the duel terminal ones first since they seem to have the most lore.

Updated

mongirlfan said:

"Curran" and "Pikeru" could be aliases too, it's their names without their titles, and their tags were named like that in Danbooru for a long time.

I just noticed Curran used to be the tag for Curran the yugioh card but at some point got aliased into Curran (dragalia lost) and then someone manually moved the yugioh Curran to another tag. I'm not sure if that alias should be undone or if it matters.

BUR #11537 has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

rename splight_blue -> spright_blue
rename splight_carrot -> spright_carrot
rename splight_jet -> spright_jet
rename splight_red -> spright_red
rename splight_pixies -> spright_pixies
rename sundered_from_overroot -> terrors_of_the_overroot
rename tearalaments_haufenis -> tearlaments_havnis
rename tearalaments_shaylen -> tearlaments_scheiren
rename tearalaments_kitakalos -> tearlaments_kitkallos
rename kurikara_the_immovable_avatar -> kurikara_divincarnate
rename exosister_malfa -> exosister_martha
rename kairyu-shin_leviathan -> ocean_dragon_lord_-_kairyu-shin
remove alias curran -> curran_(dragalia_lost)

1. Renames are for updating from fan translated -> TCG name
2. the unalias is because there is more than 1 curran and was originally the tag for curran the yugioh card Ebon_Magician_Curran until 9 months ago

1 2 3 4