AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

Gardares said:

post #9360022 is tagged with ai-generated and active (I'd change it to ai-assisted personally, but wanted to ask here first). I'm also asking about smewed artwork as a whole since three posts from them are tagged as ai-assisted (@Veraducks, @Diet_Soda, any help?) and artist's artstyle and quality look inconsistent sometimes. It's as if some of their artworks are drawn, while others look suspicious as if they were generated.

The artists admits to using AI for both reference and touch-ups: 1, 2, 3. It's probably safe to tag their entire gallery as ai-assisted, and some images are worse/more obvious than others. E.g. the one I personally tagged (post #7276333) looks like a bare minimum tracejob, you can see the manual brushstrokes on the clothes clashing with the uniform jpeg-artefacted rendering of the rest of the image, plus the guy fucking her is a mutant with his right arm and lower half (unless that was intended to be a third guy's?) completely disconnected from the rest of his body.

post #9360022 has some details which I think would be very strange to make for someone using AI "responsibly", like the green box's ribbon only wrapping one side of the box, and Fern's choker disappearing under her hair.

Freshblink said:

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=srlmao&z=1

Their style looks like a LORA of jkarts07.

Almost all their output is in the last 6 months.

Maybe its just someone who liked the style and copied it but want a second look.

Probably not, upscaling to that resolution is hard to achieve without noticeable artifacts or stitch marks from the tiling. Plus you can see with post #9477054, post #9393805, and post #9359360 them deliberately going for some of the stuff AI has trouble with (noticeably object permanence and some degree of memory for backgrounds).

1 150 151 152 153 154