AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

Popkornikus said:

post #9828183

This was definitely generated using AI. On the author’s Twitter, there are about a dozen images animated with AI. There are also many inaccuracies in his other works on Pixiv:1, 2

Yeah it is, I've added the tag, but I'm out of flags right now and hope someone can flag it.

Edit: it has been flagged.

Placeholder1996 said:

I don’t see anything obvious. I’m not certain, but I’d lean towards human.

That artist has multiple already deleted as ai-generated. I think the hair especially up by her right eye has unnatural looking stranding but otherwise nothing really sticks out.

Placeholder1996 said:

I'd like an AI-check on this artist (their latest work). I don't think it's AI, but I've been burned by art that looked similar to this before, so I want a second opinion before I post any of it.

I think it's AI. The eyes on that image are very strange, garbled and don't match. The ears are very weird as well, the logo on her blazer doesn't seem to make sense and the plaid pattern on her skirt seems to have no rhyme or reason. The sunflowers on pixiv #132980859 look quite bad as well, like they're merging into eachother.

wispydreamer said:

I think it's AI. The eyes on that image are very strange, garbled and don't match. The ears are very weird as well, the logo on her blazer doesn't seem to make sense and the plaid pattern on her skirt seems to have no rhyme or reason. The sunflowers on pixiv #132980859 look quite bad as well, like they're merging into eachother.

That’s what I was afraid of. Thanks for checking that.