Posted under General
Popkornikus said:
pixiv #134370301
pixiv #134335779What do you think of this artist? I don’t see any major mistakes, but the way the chains on the shorts are drawn bothers me.
The chains are enough to tell it's AI imo, melting together like that couldn't be anything else on this resolution. Other points, the eyelashes in pixiv #134370301 are not symmetrical along with the incosistent camera lens placement in both posts, which would be an odd error to do for a human artist twice.
Jyu0804 said:
Is there a way to block a AI Prompter in Pixiv and danbooru? I accidentally posted a Ai-generated and wanted to block the artist, so I wouldn't post it again.
Pixiv has a feature to filter out AI-generated images, but it works very poorly. If you want to block a specific artist or tag, you need a premium subscription, and even then there’s no 100% guarantee you won’t come across AI. Before uploading images to Danbooru, always check the artist’s page and look through deleted posts for AI tags. If the artist doesn’t have a page yet and you’re not completely sure it isn’t AI, you can always ask in this thread.
Looking for a second opinion
pixiv #125038282
Would like a check on the posts under rose_rnk_exia
They seem a little too prolific on Twitter, posting works every day, and oftentimes multiple per day.
NinjaPope said:
Would like a check on the posts under rose_rnk_exia
They seem a little too prolific on Twitter, posting works every day, and oftentimes multiple per day.
post #9930462 definitely looks weird. The wings are not making much sense to me. Neither is her right hand.
is this ai-generated? post #9933865
lines are too clean and it uses the same colors that every other ai generated image uses.
ai-tracker said:
is this ai-generated? post #9933865
lines are too clean and it uses the same colors that every other ai generated image uses.
You've learned absolutely nothing, I see. Gonna need better evidence than "it's too clean" in order to be taken seriously.
Also like, you can just...Investigate yourself if you care that much as opposed to throwing darts until one of them sticks. That'd be what I'd do...If I actually cared enough to do that, at least.
One of their posts (post #9916869) was tagged ai-generated without a flag. It's really hard to tell, due to the sketchy style, but if they're indeed using AI we have a lot of posts to check.
Edit: I saw their Wiki. It says they often post ai-generated and ai-assisted work. Can we check these six recent posts?
Updated by 8253803
ai-tracker said:
is this ai-generated? post #9933865
lines are too clean and it uses the same colors that every other ai generated image uses.
In addition to what Knowledge Seeker said, I could tell almost immediately that this was drawn by a human.
8253803 said:
One of their posts (post #9916869) was tagged ai-generated without a flag. It's really hard to tell, due to the sketchy style, but if they're indeed using AI we have a lot of posts to check.
Edit: I saw their Wiki. It says they often post ai-generated and ai-assisted work. Can we check these six recent posts?
There’s noticeable AI artifacts in 5 of 6 of these.
I’m not sure these are ai-assisted as much as they are ai-generated. I didn’t spot anything obvious in the sixth post, but I’ll look at it again. Edit: I still didn’t spot anything obvious in the sixth; I’m still suspicious about it though.
(left/right from our perspective)
Updated by Placeholder1996
Placeholder1996 said:
There’s noticeable AI artifacts in 5 of 6 of these.
- post #9916899 - asset #32224371: the glasses
- post #9916869 - asset #32224372: the earrings on the horse ear
- post #9913960 - asset #32224373: the left eye
- post #9913953 - asset #32224374: the left eyebrow
- post #9913943 - asset #32224375: this is the least obvious, but there’s artifacts on one of the bangs when it gets close to the left eye.
I’m not sure these are ai-assisted as much as they are ai-generated. I didn’t spot anything obvious in the sixth post, but I’ll look at it again.
(left/right from our perspective)
I only have four flags left. I'm flagging the first 4 of the 5. I think these flaws show they don't have enough human input. The 5th one should also be flagged.
The final one is hard to tell. I personally don't think a human would be so messy with the sweater - this looks more tiring to draw than actually drawing the texture properly.
8253803 said:
I only have four flags left. I'm flagging the first 4 of the 5. I think these flaws show they don't have enough human input. The 5th one should also be flagged.
The final one is hard to tell. I personally don't think a human would be so messy with the sweater - this looks more tiring to draw than actually drawing the texture properly.
I flagged the last one
Looks very suspicious.
VR-Man said:
Looks very suspicious.
No source and the resolution is 832x1216 *2 so probably.
Also the artist tag seems to be wrong.
EDIT: I checked again, yes it is.
Updated by asgembed . js
Suspicious of this one since the artist seems to have no previous art here despite the detail.
Since I'm at it, what's the correct URL I should copy for the fetcher to grab Facebook links? The above link results in a "code 400 Bad Request" message.
Marlor said:
Again, forum #376406. Next time, provide a lot more than just an artist's name. I see nothing suspicious with their art.
Unsure if AI. New user, filename implies it was created less than three days ago.
Narrator-1 said:
Unsure if AI. New user, filename implies it was created less than three days ago.
I can't tell if it's AI either; non-web source + new user + no artist is a red flag though. In either case, I don't think it's going to be approved.
Placeholder1996 said:
Again, forum #376406. Next time, provide a lot more than just an artist's name. I see nothing suspicious with their art.
Again, forum #385136. If I'm sure it's AI I don't need this forum, I Just flag it and describe why it's AI there.
It's "AI check thread", not "AI flag approve thread".
