wispydreamer said in forum #413767:
This pool just feels way too subjective to me and a bit "bashing of styles you don't like". Like post #2887540 was clearly uncanny enough for two people to state it in the comments and add it to the pool but it looks like a perfectly average anime style to me. I think it could work as a tag if it was only for images intended to be uncanny, like an offshoot of horror (theme), but I don't think it works as a tag as it is now.
I'll iterate that I'm not strong in favour or against converting back to a tag but I'll play the other side to make an argument for making it a tag.
I disagree with the "bashing of styles you don't like" sentiment here. For starters, we already have tags like bad anatomy, bad proportions, artistic error, engrish text etc... To my knowledge, those are very rarely ever weaponsied, if at all.
For the example you used with post #2887540, I don't think it overly matters since we have some pretty subjective tags already. Even the horror (theme) tag you mention later is subjective, as well as simple things like the infamous miku hair. Worst case scenario, the worst offenders can be gardened out but as long as the feel of the tag remains somewhat consistent then it should be fine.
You mention how it can work as an offshoot of horror (theme) but I don't think this works because intention can often be hard to figure out, especially with lack of or missing commentary. Artists also lie about their own stuff and what they say can be visually very different in the art they create.
If uncanny valley can't work as a tag then it can't work as a collection pool since we're phasing those out. The question would be whether this would work better as a future votable tag or if it should be nuked. My actual opinion would be that it should not be nuked as this is something I feel people might want to find.