Mysterious_Uploader said:
1k+ posts but no wiki, i'm unsure if it should be converted to a pool.
Well we already have pool #1574, is this tag much different?
Posted under General
Mysterious_Uploader said:
1k+ posts but no wiki, i'm unsure if it should be converted to a pool.
Well we already have pool #1574, is this tag much different?
Unbreakable said:
Well we already have pool #1574, is this tag much different?
I use it for things other than those that involve dramatic action shots (pool #1574), such as those with a feeling of vigorous motion currently taking place like in post #3975654 and post #3884681, or about to take place like in post #3825375, or has already taken place like in post #3096968. Looking through the action posts, it seems like many others are tagging in the same vein.
For this, the pool is too restrictive. I'd prefer to keep it a tag myself. If desired, I can throw something like the above into a wiki.
The bulk update request #3065 (forum #169680) has been approved by @evazion.
What's the point of poker face? Should it be merged into expressionless?
nonamethanks said:
What's the point of poker face? Should it be merged into expressionless?
I have once tagged this post #3904236 with poker face for the face Jashin-chan makes, which is definely the same poker face meme. But it seems most of the posts tagged are just expressionless.
mongirlfan said:
I have once tagged this post #3904236 with poker face for the face Jashin-chan makes, which is definely the same poker face meme. But it seems most of the posts tagged are just expressionless.
I created poker face (meme) for it and moved the rest to expressionless.
planted (and also some of the tags that implicate it) are currently described as "[...] that is visibly impaling the ground".
However, looking at the tagged posts, in many the object is simply planted on the ground, not impaling it. Just a few examples: post #4025979, post #4023957, post #3915750, post #3900647, post #3795028.
For some objects, notably planted_umbrella, the impaling definition is also not particularly useful (since it's very rare for an umbrella to impale the ground).
The wikis should probably be updated to cover both the cases where the object is impaling the ground (typically standing by itself), and where the object is planted on the ground (typically held by a person).
Maybe the "visibly" in "visibly impaling" should also be removed, as there are many posts where it's not actually visible in the image, just implied. Examples: post #4037706, post #3510743, post #3491983, post #3425279, post #3798894.
Images where depicted pubic hair is exclusively applied to male characters. (Similar to the male focus tag.)
Should it really be exclusively? If yes, then it will be pretty hard to search for hetero images where only the female has pubic hair, because you can´t exclude male pubic hair for those cases. (Wiki is from 2012)
| male_pubic_hair means exclusively male | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hairy Female | Hairless Female | ||
| Hairy Male | pubic_hair | male_pubic_hair | |
| Hairless Male | pubic_hair | -pubic_hair | |
| male_pubic_hair means any case of it | |||
| Hairy Female | Hairless Female | ||
| Hairy Male | male_pubic_hair | male_pubic_hair | |
| Hairless Male | pubic_hair -male_pubic_hair | -pubic_hair |
Updated
I have to double post because my formatting for the above is kinda janky, but here's an explanation:
Option 1 can't distinguish between a hairy and hairless male when the female is hairy. Option 2 can't distinguish between a hairy and hairless female when the male is hairy. You lose something either way.
The wiki's approach is better for female searching, hence it being that way. However, the only foolproof way is to have pubic hair tags for both genders.
Updated
Requesting howto:test as I can assume the sandbox to test API stuff (to prevent messing this live site) is located in this exact testbooru.
EB said:
Want to get some thoughts on the current izakaya wiki. I don't really agree with what's written there currently, on suggesting the bar tag is more suitable. The typical bar image on Danbooru doesn't look like an izakaya, so it makes them harder to find if the suggestion is followed.
Related: forum #132152
I agree that an izakaya is visually distinct from a bar and should be its own tag, but I'm not sure how to describe one other than "a Japanese-style pub". How much detail is necessary to adequately explain the differences?
iridescent_slime said:
Related: forum #132152
I agree that an izakaya is visually distinct from a bar and should be its own tag, but I'm not sure how to describe one other than "a Japanese-style pub". How much detail is necessary to adequately explain the differences?
The English Wikipedia page provides a decent amount of detail and could be linked, I guess. The main differences in my mind from most of what's in the bar tag right now is the more traditional Japanese appearance and food being served in addition to drinks.
Victory pose has a placeholder entry for years (2017 to be precise). Maybe anyone wants to improve it? Thanks in advance.
Hillside_Moose said:
The wiki for donation_box calls your specific examples charity_box, yet I don't see the tag being used at all.
A cloud of smoke that indicates two characters are fighting.
A substance that is given off when another substance is burning.
__
That's right?
A dust cloud when fighting a characters in a cloud.
Posts count is small, we can remove "two" from description.