Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

qme said:

Already posted these nothing new you don't gotta check.

Well, don’t.

OP said:

#1 - You are not guaranteed feedback. It is entirely voluntary to give it.

Even though it’s not explicitly mentioned in this thread’s rules, the same rules as for topic #8554 apply:

4) Never appeal a post twice. Multiple mods saw it the first time you did. They also saw it when it was first uploaded. It got its fair shot.

5) Never appeal all your deleted posts at once. Only appeal the absolute best. If all or most of your uploads have been deleted, you need to lurk more and get a better idea of what is acceptable.

6) Never expect or demand feedback or justification. You may get some, if anyone feels like providing it or has anything specific to say. However there are too many appeals and too many other things for us to do for us to have time to critique every appeal.

If you didn’t get any comments the first time, you won’t get any the second time. Stop being an annoyance.

kittey said:

Even though it’s not explicitly mentioned in this thread’s rules, the same rules as for topic #8554 apply:

Sounds like a lie. Thanks for finally telling me to stop.

post #3583433

I'd like feedback on post #3588068. Apparently at least two people thought it was poor quality. I know Caffein's works are sometimes wonky so I can understand why some of them wouldn't be approved, but this post in particular seems like a rather decent quality work so I'm quite surprised that not only did it not get approved, but that it was actually downvoted as well.

luntoer said:

I'd like feedback on post #3588068. Apparently at least two people thought it was poor quality. I know Caffein's works are sometimes wonky so I can understand why some of them wouldn't be approved, but this post in particular seems like a rather decent quality work so I'm quite surprised that not only did it not get approved, but that it was actually downvoted as well.

My eyes were initially drawn to the waist being smaller than the face by a considerable margin. The second hand seems like it is disappearing where it should have some visibility, but that is pretty minor compared to the first note.

luntoer said:

I'd like feedback on post #3588068. Apparently at least two people thought it was poor quality. I know Caffein's works are sometimes wonky so I can understand why some of them wouldn't be approved, but this post in particular seems like a rather decent quality work so I'm quite surprised that not only did it not get approved, but that it was actually downvoted as well.

Her face is the only thing keeping me from approving it, the rest is fine but that face really disturbs me, can't say if I was one of the "poor quality" ones though.

post #3521067
post #3521055

If too many of my uploads end up unapproved, does this jeopardize my account privileges in any fashion? Out of 45, only 14 are approved for me.

baconmeh2 said:

If too many of my uploads end up unapproved, does this jeopardize my account privileges in any fashion? Out of 45, only 14 are approved for me.

You're not going to lose Platinum account level for poor uploads, and I highly doubt that any moderator will give you a ban just for poor upload quality unless you're obviously trolling.

That said, why go to the trouble of uploading and tagging images that will obviously never be approved? Your account is nearly a decade old; you should know by now that the approvers have zero interest in hot garbage like post #3403078, yet you continue to upload work by artists who have no concept of anatomy or perspective. It seems like an awful lot of wasted time and effort.

iridescent_slime said:

You're not going to lose Platinum account level for poor uploads, and I highly doubt that any moderator will give you a ban just for poor upload quality unless you're obviously trolling.

That said, why go to the trouble of uploading and tagging images that will obviously never be approved? Your account is nearly a decade old; you should know by now that the approvers have zero interest in hot garbage like post #3403078, yet you continue to upload work by artists who have no concept of anatomy or perspective. It seems like an awful lot of wasted time and effort.

I thought they were worth sharing at least.

I am legitimately confused as to why the standard for quality is so damn high, and most of the time it makes zero sense
I think post #3592273 and post #3499259 are a perfectly fine posts, yet what

I am wondering why post #3594438 got denied, i see nothing bad at these 4 pieces of art.

I'd have a lot of questions about my uploads. If it were for me, it would be for all of them but... hey, what can you do.
I've seen a lot of artwork, I browse pixiv almost everyday and have some knowledge about art theory. I think I got a fair sense of what is a good artwork. Having said that, I understand some illust. are not necessarily material for the curated pool, but I find them well drawn enough and a bit of interesting to archive them on the site.

I want to know, what made this post to make someone believe it has poor quality?

post #3595004

I'd like a critique about post #3595707 if I may?

I mean, most of my posts have been chancing it at best, but I honestly thought that one may get approved.

Asurey said:

I'd have a lot of questions about my uploads. If it were for me, it would be for all of them but... hey, what can you do.
I've seen a lot of artwork, I browse pixiv almost everyday and have some knowledge about art theory. I think I got a fair sense of what is a good artwork. Having said that, I understand some illust. are not necessarily material for the curated pool, but I find them well drawn enough and a bit of interesting to archive them on the site.

I want to know, what made this post to make someone believe it has poor quality?

post #3595004

The biggest problem is her back and spine, since between her hard lean, her butt angled sharply in the air, her ponytail making her back look short, and the perspective not working, her spine seems crunched and overly bent.

The gigantic breasts don't seem connected to the sides, and generally look floaty and off. Larger breasts tend to be held to higher scrutiny (to a fault, generally, but I could see someone complain here).

The guy in front doesn't make sense either, as his hands come from a different angle from where the girl is looking and reaching, and the bulge seems to float in from a different angle entirely.

post #3593577
post #3593574
post #3593564
post #3590840

I posted similar work like:

post #3593476
post #3590823
post #3581254

Thank you

post #3500282 (parent:2072721) unapproved
parent:2072721 approved. I don't understand why.

ネ申 said:

post #3500282 (parent:2072721) unapproved
parent:2072721 approved. I don't understand why.

they weren't approved. They're posted by people with unlimited privilege. Besides not putting down a source doesn't give you any brownie points.

PhoenixG said:

they weren't approved. They're posted by people with unlimited privilege. Besides not putting down a source doesn't give you any brownie points.

oh...thx

So I was recommended to ask here and while I was trying to do that I ended up accidently posting this in general again...so i apologize. Anyways here is the message.

Hey, I'm new to Danbooru and all I wanted to do was upload my commissions since the four pictures got updated and so did the source link, and I kept messing around the with the tags since I thought somebody was trolling me by adding tags I never put in before, but now I realize that the reason why my posts were deleted is probably that I was actually fighting against a mod making the tags. I didn't understand so I apologize. Would it please be okay for my 4 uploads to get undeleted and approved?
post #3598565

These 4 are my other commission that I posted recently but did the tag thing. Again I apologize.
post #3603660