[Arknights] Costume implications

Posted under Tags

evazion

magcolo said:

There was a topic for that, topic #33479.

Then put it in the wiki. The Seaborn still doesn't say what the tag actually is (an enemy unit in Arknights), instead it's just a bunch of in-game lore and a bunch of examples that aren't even clear pictures of the Seaborn themselves.

Reply
NNTBot

BUR #51449 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication fang_the_fire-sharpened_(a_pure_pianissimo)_(arknights) -> fang_the_fire-sharpened_(arknights)

beep boop

Tags without a wiki that couldn't be submitted

This is an automatic post. Use topic #31779 to report errors/false positives or general feedback.

Reply
CommentaryRequest hdk5 Servitor 2152 Kawakijin People of the Book
NNTBot

BUR #51450 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication theresa_(condolence)_(arknights) -> theresa_(arknights)

beep boop

Tags without a wiki that couldn't be submitted

This is an automatic post. Use topic #31779 to report errors/false positives or general feedback.

Reply
CommentaryRequest hdk5 Servitor 2152 Kawakijin People of the Book Uselessful FratmCforo
WRS

@thefoxne Do not manually nuke or rename tags without discussion. Gilberta (Arknights)'s tag is named this way and has implications because of consensus discussion. Either create a new topic or post a BUR here if you want to propose a change to how she is currently tagged, do not unilaterally do it on your own. I've reverted your changes accordingly.

Reply
FratmCforo

NNTBot said:

BUR #51450 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication theresa_(condolence)_(arknights) -> theresa_(arknights)

beep boop

Tags without a wiki that couldn't be submitted

This is an automatic post. Use topic #31779 to report errors/false positives or general feedback.

I'm personally against this tag implication, as the Condolence skin is not a costume for the non-playable character Theresa, but rather for Civilight Eterna, who has similar appearance but is ultimately a different character.

In my opinion, the currently existing tag civilight eterna should be renamed to civilight eterna (crown) and a new one should be created for the character itself civilight_eterna_(arknights), which would then be implied to the original Theresa (arknights).

This would function similarly to how Wakaba Mutsumi and Mortis (Bang Dream!) work. While they look identical, context clues provide a clear distinction between the two personalities and thus the tags should reflect that.

Reply
NNTBot

BUR #51517 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication reed_the_flame_shadow_(glowing_flame_in_the_night)_(arknights) -> reed_the_flame_shadow_(arknights)

beep boop

Tags without a wiki that couldn't be submitted

This is an automatic post. Use topic #31779 to report errors/false positives or general feedback.

Reply
CommentaryRequest FratmCforo Kawakijin
333752

FratmCforo said:

I'm personally against this tag implication, as the Condolence skin is not a costume for the non-playable character Theresa, but rather for Civilight Eterna, who has similar appearance but is ultimately a different character.

In my opinion, the currently existing tag civilight eterna should be renamed to civilight eterna (crown) and a new one should be created for the character itself civilight_eterna_(arknights), which would then be implied to the original Theresa (arknights).

This would function similarly to how Wakaba Mutsumi and Mortis (Bang Dream!) work. While they look identical, context clues provide a clear distinction between the two personalities and thus the tags should reflect that.

CE and Theresa look practically identical, and there is no real benefit for differentiating those two. All that would result from your idea is another double implication CE_costume > CE > Theresa; and bunch of confusion for how character should be tagged.
As for example: they are clearly not visually same and is easily identified to get tagged as such. If you still think you are right, count number of arts you think are going to benefit from differentiating them and provide post IDs in reply.

Edit: It is obvious that almost only thing that can be used to identify each other is meta knowledge supplied by additional image context, and I don't find it valuable enough.

Reply
NNTBot

BUR #51949 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication haze_(elite_ii)_(arknights) -> haze_(arknights)
create implication leizi_(elite_ii)_(arknights) -> leizi_(arknights)
create implication lemuen_(elite_ii)_(arknights) -> lemuen_(arknights)
create implication phantom_(elite_ii)_(arknights) -> phantom_(arknights)

beep boop

Tags without a wiki that couldn't be submitted

This is an automatic post. Use topic #31779 to report errors/false positives or general feedback.

Reply
CommentaryRequest
NNTBot

BUR #51950 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication lin_(elite_ii)_(arknights) -> lin_(arknights)

beep boop

Tags without a wiki that couldn't be submitted

This is an automatic post. Use topic #31779 to report errors/false positives or general feedback.

Reply
CommentaryRequest
1 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 36